But in this case you're OK with the SCOTUS making new law because it runs parallel with your ideology.
Were you OK with O'Connor's replacing diversity for "equal protection"?
I'm not OK with either one and I'm not OK with the feds imposing pot laws on states either.
If California wants to de-criminalise weed, it's up to them not DC.
You see, even when results run counter to my social conservatism, I recognise that either we have a Constitution or we don't. At this point, we don't.