[RAT Patrol]

let me just put it this way - your desire to use the apparatus of the state to force others to live by your particular religious view of sexual morality is bad.

Clever, though terribly hypocritical. At least you are admitting that there is at least one moral absolute and it is bad. What gives you the right to say that?

BTW, I am not asking anyone to live according to my particular religious views. Nice try at changing the subject. The Constitution doesn't say there must be a separation of morality and state. Our Founders wanted moral laws.

Are you for banning taxpayer dollars from being used to research, fund, educate, etc...about these bedroom activities?

[jethropalerobber]

I am not asking anyone to live according to my particular religious views.

riiiight, you're not asking anyone, you're just telling them that if they don't they could be fined or thrown in jail.

The Constitution doesn't say there must be a separation of morality and state.

since you use 'morality' as a code word for 'religion' i would say your claim about the constitution is wrong.

Are you for banning taxpayer dollars from being used to research, fund, educate, etc...about these bedroom activities?

naturally i am.
what a strange question. i'm not 100% sure, but i don't think our government has ever spent taxpayer dollars funding oral or anal sex.