Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thane_Banquo
exactly, acts of moral deprevity(sp?) that occur between consenting parties(adults)
versus those that harm, or cause harm, to others.
is how I define it.
1,118 posted on 06/26/2003 1:32:11 PM PDT by vin-one (I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1095 | View Replies ]


To: vin-one
Right, but we cannot get away from the fact that our criminal laws, and our choices on what issues not to legislate, have moral bases. So we cannot really say the government shouldn't regulate morality. It is too sweeping. Perhaps a better statement would be the government should not make laws (which are based on moral view) when there are no injuries to non-consenting parties.

Honestly I do not believe it is the Texas legislatures role to regulate private sexual acts, but from a 10th amendment perspective, and a perspective of precedent historically being expanded beyond its original intent, this was bad law handed down by SCOTUS.
1,135 posted on 06/26/2003 1:39:16 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson