Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Eisenberg
I suggest that if the state is going to run a law school, the legislature should dictate objective admissions criteria only, such as tests scores and grade point average.

The problem with that is that even the makers of standardized tests don't recommend overemphasizing the test scores and as you allude to, GPAs from different schools are directly compatible.

114 posted on 06/24/2003 5:06:15 AM PDT by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: garbanzo
The problem with that is that even the makers of standardized tests don't recommend overemphasizing the test scores and as you allude to, GPAs from different schools are directly compatible.

I know that the undergraduate admissions offices come up with a predictive index based on each applicants test scores, grades, and high school. Law schools, if they don't do the same, could. There is no necessity to base admissions on soft criteria like interviews and how enthusiastic are the recommendations.

If I was in my state legislature's education committee, I simply would not trust the people in charge of our state university to treat conservatives fairly in either admissions or hiring. With hiring, it is tough to do something about. But in admissions, why not a push to mandate objectivity?

145 posted on 06/24/2003 3:35:15 PM PDT by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson