Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
I hate to be pedantic, but there was no 'Year 0', of course.
2 posted on 06/22/2003 9:07:33 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: headsonpikes
"I hate to be pedantic, but there was no 'Year 0', of course."

To steal a phrase, "I post'em, you decide."

3 posted on 06/22/2003 9:22:48 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headsonpikes

4 posted on 06/22/2003 9:26:52 AM PDT by The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headsonpikes
"I hate to be pedantic, but there was no 'Year 0', of course."

It's silly, in any case, since the Chinese calendar goes back some 5000+ years. We're so presumptuous to believe that history revolves around Western civilization. Feh!
6 posted on 06/22/2003 9:43:16 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headsonpikes
Well, what would be the proper way to state it? The year immediatley preceeding the year 1?
11 posted on 06/22/2003 9:54:41 AM PDT by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson