You might enjoy this - Mark Steyn nails the NGOs and the press for misreporting (and America-bashing):
Mark Steyn: Others can do the caring
The Spectator (U.K.) ^ | 06/21/03 | Mark Steyn
~~~
After I wrote about
my trip to Iraq in the Sunday Telegraph and its sister papers, I received quite a few emails from US troops in the country, the gist of which was summed up by one guy with a civil affairs unit near Baghdad:
Im glad to hear somebody report whats really going on ...the fact that there isnt anything going on. I saw no anarchy, no significant anti-US hostility, and no hospitals at anything like capacity. In other words, I was unable to find Will Days Iraq. I dont honestly think it exists outside his head: as Dinah Washington once sang, Water difference a Day makes; he has miraculously transformed Iraqi water into whine.
~~~
In October 2001 Faizul-Aqtab Siddiqi, president-general of the International Muslim Organisation, said bombing Afghanistan would create a thousand bin Ladens. It didnt. In March this year President Mubarak of Egypt said bombing Iraq would create a hundred bin Ladens. So right there youve got a tenfold decrease in the bin Laden creation programme. But even that modest revised target wasnt met. Theres widespread starvation and disease and millions of refugees in Iraq. Except there arent. The Baghdad Museum was looted of its treasures. Only it wasnt.
What all these fictions have in common is the prejudice behind them: the article of blind faith that the Americans are blundering idiots who know nothing of the world. It was this that led Robert Fisk, whom my colleague Stephen Glover regards as a genius, to suggest in print that when the Yanks claimed to be at Baghdad International Airport theyd in fact wandered by accident on to an abandoned RAF airfield many miles away. Nobody who knows anything about a modern military or even the kind of GPS technology that Chevrolet now include in their mid-price trucks and SUVs would say anything so stupid in print unless he were so blinded by irrational Yankophobia that he was impervious to anything so prosaic as reality.
~~~
If the overriding issue for M. Parris is American hegemony, the issue for me is the rise of transnational neo-imperialism. Id rather take my chances with nation-states and great power politics than submit to international law.
I think Nato and the UN Security Council need damaging, and so does Americas relationship with Europe. And the jet-set humanitarians, as represented by Will Day, might also benefit from being forced to rethink their act. There is, of course, a real humanitarian crisis in the world today in the Congo, an environment blessedly free of blundering Yanks, where international law has ridden to the rescue and, as in the Balkans and elsewhere, the UN is providing the usual genteel multilateral cover for ethnic slaughter. But, because it doesnt accord with the New Universal Theory of Texan-Zionist neocon aggression, nobody cares.
Thanks. Ole Mark is always entertaining.