Skip to comments.
300,000 M-14s destined for trash pile
WorldNet Daily ^
| June 15, 2003
Posted on 06/15/2003 1:13:08 PM PDT by Mini-14
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
1
posted on
06/15/2003 1:13:09 PM PDT
by
Mini-14
To: *bang_list
bang
2
posted on
06/15/2003 1:14:01 PM PDT
by
Mini-14
To: Mini-14
You just made me cry...
I hope you are happy with yourself
3
posted on
06/15/2003 1:17:22 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: joesnuffy
Only a truly evil person could destroy a M-14.
4
posted on
06/15/2003 1:19:15 PM PDT
by
Mini-14
To: Mini-14
The DCM program to save the M-14s could work like a similar program involving another venerable military workhorse, the M-1 (Garand) and M-1 carbine series of military rifles. But.... (lips quivering) it looks "evil"....
Ahhh for the "Good Old Days" when DCM sold $12.50 M1911's and $20.00 M1 Carbines!!!!
5
posted on
06/15/2003 1:21:23 PM PDT
by
ExSES
To: Mini-14
AR-15/M-16 is the way to go.........no doubt
6
posted on
06/15/2003 1:26:54 PM PDT
by
sfvgt
To: Mini-14
Heck, their giving them away to police dept.'s. Were getting 4 M-14's and 4 M-16's too. Said it was for Homeland Security.
I'd like to have an '03 Springfield. Would go nice with my M-1 carbine and my M-1A.
To: Mini-14
If uncle sugar would just sell them for 500 bucks a pop that would be a nice chunk of change...
He could even fund medical care for disabled combat vets with the moolah ..at least offset some costs..
8
posted on
06/15/2003 1:38:17 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Mini-14
300,000 rifles could wind up in the scrap heap without the government getting any return on its investment. Without the govt getting any return.... & here I thought they were bought with tax payers money...
9
posted on
06/15/2003 1:39:46 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: sfvgt
"AR-15/M-16 is the way to go.........no doubt"
It's a classic debate, but there inarguably is doubt.
If the enemies of your freedom were carrying M-16s, and were over 400 yards away (or closer, with light intervening brush), wouldn't you vastly prefer to have a .308 (such as the M14), so that you could get solid hits out to 600 yards, before they ever got within the range of their varmint rifles?
To: Mini-14
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!
11
posted on
06/15/2003 1:42:34 PM PDT
by
PoorMuttly
(M-14 good....M-16 yuck...but light. Has "light" won wars in our hands ?...)
To: Mini-14
I want one!
12
posted on
06/15/2003 1:42:37 PM PDT
by
glorgau
To: joesnuffy
"He could even fund medical care for disabled combat vets with the moolah ..at least offset some costs.."
Uncle Sam provide decent medical care for those wounded in action in the service of our country? Not likely! Just look at the members of the senate! You think they're going to support something honorable?
13
posted on
06/15/2003 1:43:03 PM PDT
by
OldCorps
To: joesnuffy
The market price (even accounting for the effect on the market of releasing them) is closer to $1500, not $500. Those USGI forged receivers, even if fully stripped, should fetch EASILY $500 each, maybe $750.
Anything at or under $1000, and they would be an excellent investment with which to fill your basement.
To: Beelzebubba
most firefights happen within 200 yards.......and I don't want to haul a 11 pound plus 308........it's just personal taste, to me, the weight of the weapon is critical when on the move......
15
posted on
06/15/2003 1:45:58 PM PDT
by
sfvgt
To: Mini-14
Air-drop every one of these into Iran with six loaded mags apiece, I say.
I'll buy one back at a premium when the Federal Republic of Persia sends them back to the US.
To: Beelzebubba
Just to let you know, I saw a high speed photograph of a .308 being deflected by a playing card. I also saw a demonstration where a .50 BMG bullet was deflected by a one inch tree branch.
17
posted on
06/15/2003 1:50:50 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: sfvgt
I've fired every Army rife and machine gun that was in use from the 80's to the late 90's. This includes grease guns, M16's (of course), an occasional M14, M60 and M2 machine guns. Also fired some appropriated AK47s and AKMSs.
I was amazed at the accuracy of the M14. To my mind, this is really a great rifle, probably the most accurate firearm in wide distribution within the military. Were I a company commander today, I'd want a soldier in each platoon armed with a sniper version of the M14.
18
posted on
06/15/2003 1:51:14 PM PDT
by
OldCorps
To: OldCorps
I don't know when you got out of the military, but the M-16 is a lot better than when I was in. The Garands and the M1A's are disappearing from the High Power Matches. 600 yards max.
The M-16's are also a lot easier to maintain.
Overall though, I can't argue that a scoped M-14 is an incredible weapon for 600-900.
19
posted on
06/15/2003 1:59:47 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: joesnuffy
Without the govt getting any return.... & here I thought they were bought with tax payers money...
Good point! I can't believe I missed that when I read the article. They should be given away to taxpayers who would like to have them.
I used to have an old M1. Hadn't thought about it in years.
20
posted on
06/15/2003 2:13:44 PM PDT
by
gitmo
(The Clintons stole more national treasures from the White House than were stolen from Iraqi Museums.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson