The depriving it of funding from the US treasury would should not be a problem.
You say you are for "free markets", yet you want to erect barriers to "free markets" to protect your job. That costs me money, it takes money from my family, it is nothing more than the use of government power to enrich yourself. That, my friend is robbery, and those are the "points" you raised. Please tell me of any barriers to free trade I have proposed in this letter. I am for enforcing our immigration law as it stands. You sir are a liar and a fraud. Your defense of of US taxpayer dollars being spent for your personal gain and the gain of foreign nationals is disgusting. Why don't you either tell the truth or go play with the other lying Socialists, iternationalists, and Communists at DU.
By the way for anyone interested here is the OPIC web site OPIC . Their own website states they are an agency of the US Government. I note the ".gov" domain name. My information on their programs and policies comes from the OPIC website.
Now please back up one of your accusations with a reference or go back to DU. Truly, you did not use the term "living wage" for IT professionals. I used that to describe a policies that are the equivalent of a "living wage". You want to limit competition to protect your job and your wages. Explain how that differs from the "living wage" argument advanced by democrats. Both want to guarantee you a job, a wage, and a standard of living.