I am gratified to now read that we agree.
"Anyone" would be convicted of murder if "anyone" shot someone in the back, especially if it was eight times.
I rest my case. Thank you ladies and gentleman of jury.
Too cute by half. The problem you are left with though, is that you asked a question about the 2nd Amendment and responded to my answer with a few frail quips about the circumstances surrounding the event. Make up your mind, do you wish to argue facts or do you wish to argue the law? You can argue either one of those, but only one of them at a time.
Well, all is not a loss, at least you have confirmed that my original instinct to ignore your illogical question was well founded: If you can't advance a logical question, why should I then expect a logical response?
--Boot Hill