Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tahiti
tahiti says:   "I would hope you do not think being shot in the back is 'due process of law'."

Your comparison to Stalin was despicable and unwarranted and displays a cop-bashing mentality.

Under the circumstances that were described in the accompanying news story, there was zero failure of due process. The fact that the wounds were in the back is of no material value, because once the officers felt their life's were in jeopardy (the only issue in this shooting), the shooting should not cease until that jeopardy ceased to exist. Which way the perp was facing the exact moment the bullets struck is irrelevant.

--Boot Hill

123 posted on 06/14/2003 8:18:59 PM PDT by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: Boot Hill
"...because once the officers felt their life's were in jeopardy..."

Since just because of the utterance of such a phrase, listed above, indicates that you fail to compehend how inmicable to liberty that such a phrase represents, that I give up as hopeless in my attempt to talk to you about the issues of liberty, other than to recommend to you that you change your handle from "Boot Hill" to BOOT LICKER.

125 posted on 06/15/2003 8:17:57 AM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson