Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hobbes1
If that was to hold any water, the Tap would not have been surreptitious, now would it?

Yes it would. This is the same guy who required the police to get search warrants before letting them into the house to search for clues in his wife's disappearance. Catching kidnappers need not come with the cooperation of the next of kin as it is the people of California who want the kidnappers apprehended.

Because we "think' something may be going on

You are not accurate in paraphrasing my second reason. His own words stating that he knew who did it hardly qualifies as a fishing expedition. The next of kin tells his secret girlfriend that he knows who is responsible for his wife's disappearance and you call that fishing? (And the police have it on tape...from Amber's willing phone tap)

76 posted on 06/12/2003 12:32:46 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: RGSpincich
This is the same guy who required the police to get search warrants before letting them into the house

As well they should. He has a legal right to document WHY they are in his home...

78 posted on 06/12/2003 12:34:44 PM PDT by hobbes1 ( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson