Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clouda
Labine allegedly issued the warrant allowing Scott Peterson's phones to be tapped from Jan.10 to April 18 -- a time when investigators maintained publicly that he was not a suspect in the case.

Conversely, If he was NOT A SUSPECT, why tap his phones?

49 posted on 06/12/2003 11:37:53 AM PDT by hobbes1 ( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: hobbes1
Conversely, If he was NOT A SUSPECT, why tap his phones?

Because if Laci was kidnapped he would be the one most likely to be called with ransom demands.

50 posted on 06/12/2003 11:41:30 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: hobbes1
Labine allegedly issued the warrant allowing Scott Peterson's phones to be tapped from Jan.10 to April 18

And why wouldn't they? It was obvious at that point in time that not one word of what Scott Peterson had told them was true.

63 posted on 06/12/2003 12:09:38 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: hobbes1
Why tap his phones? Maybe b/c if Laci had been kidnapped, the logical person for the kidnapper to contact to try to get ransom, would be her husband?
72 posted on 06/12/2003 12:28:03 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson