Replies

"how does speculation here on FR change the outcome (of) the verdict?"

I guess you've missed all the self- congratulatory posts 'here on FR' that claim to have changed the course of US politics and debate in general?

"Free" though we might like to consider it, the internet is right up there with (or ahead of) print and broadcast media in its ability to forge opinions:
the opinions that dominate here and elsewhere are violently in agreement with FOX: Laci good, Laci family good, Scott bad, etc.

WE do'n need no steenkin' evidence, we do'n need no steenkin' trial, we need a steenkin rope!

The public may not at this point know evidence which proves Scott's guilt for the murders, but the public has indeed seen hard evidence that Scott is a very cold specimen of a human being. That evidence being, just for starters, his long interviews with Diane Sawyer and with another reporter (watch 'em before you decide to defend 'em), and the pictures of him cracking jokes and smiling on New Year's Eve (one week after she disappeared), and many other things which we have seen with our own eyes.