Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lanza; runningbear; Jackie-O; All
Very interesting.......

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0306/09/lkl.00.html

Ted Rolands, what's the latest? Understand sources have told you about what Scott might have done after Laci's disappearance?

TED ROLANDS, KTVU-TV: Yes, we've had it confirmed from multiple sources on both sides of this investigation that Scott Peterson on a number of occasions went to the San Francisco Bay at different times of the day after Laci was missing. Of course, he was picked up by surveillance, a couple of times he was reported to have been seen there. And then they had that GPS tracker on him, so they were watching his every move.

And obviously, from an investigation standpoint, this raised a red flag, because there would be no plausible explanation of why this individual would be at a fishing -- a place where he went fishing and should have no other significance. So they really took note to that.

The defense admits that, indeed, he did make some trips up there, but they point out he has a sister that lives in Berkeley, and he was using the Bay area as sort of a safe haven to get away from the media. And he knew that police were searching in the bay, and they -- he had been told that that is where they thought Laci was.

So he went there because of those reasons and wanted to monitor the search. So a very interesting development.

KING: Also, Nancy Grace, if he doesn't take the stand, that could never come up, could it?

NANCY GRACE, COURT TV; FORMER PROSECUTOR: Well, the fact that he went back and forth to the location (UNINTELLIGIBLE)...

KING: I mean, how would it come, how would it come up at a trial if he never took the stand in his own defense? Who would be bringing up where he went?

GRACE: Whoever did the surveillance as part of the investigation, it would come in that way. And Larry, this is not a cliche, that very often you will find criminal defendants go back to the scene of the crime. Larry, it's not part of their big plan. It's almost as if they can't help it that they have to go back.

In fact, at the very beginning, when Scott came under suspicion, you and I actually talked about whether he had been seen after the disappearance at Berkeley Marina. It's very typical.

183 posted on 06/10/2003 6:44:15 PM PDT by clouda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: clouda
Thank you Clouda. I thought I heard this on Dateline, but it must have been on the LKL rerun last night as I dozed off and on.


Very interesting indeed....
186 posted on 06/10/2003 7:13:23 PM PDT by Lanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: clouda
Thanks clouda. I missed that on LKL also!! btw I stopped in at Wendy's on the way home and picked up a Southwest Chicken salad - my mouth is burning!! LOL tasty tho.
188 posted on 06/10/2003 7:19:57 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: clouda
this raised a red flag, because there would be no plausible explanation of why this individual would be at a fishing -- a place where he went fishing and should have no other significance

The fact that every Radio, TV station and newspaper in the entire state was reporting that the police were searching for his dead wife in that location isn't a "plausible reason" for him to be there?

Guilty or not, if they were searching in a very public way for my dead wife I would go out and watch.

212 posted on 06/10/2003 10:27:46 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson