Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. seniors bypass law, cross border to fill prescriptions
Houston Chronicle ^ | 6/8/03

Posted on 06/08/2003 1:43:09 PM PDT by areafiftyone

NUEVO PROGRESO, Mexico -- The warnings don't stop them. The White House reform plan doesn't make them wait.

They are on a personal quest involving money and health. So they trek across the border, alone or with loved ones, in a hopeful tide of humanity. They violate the law on such a huge scale that the government basically has given up on catching them.

They are refugees-for-a-day from the U.S. prescription drug system.

Margie Cockrill, 76, is one of them. She crossed the Rio Grande on a luxury tour bus from Corpus Christi, wearing a purple pantsuit and a lapel pin in the colors of the American flag.

Then, holding a mesh shopping bag that advertises her favorite foreign pharmacy, she headed straight for that drug store, one of dozens in this compact tourist town. There she found the Mexican treasure that is so elusive in Texas for Medicare beneficiaries like her: a steep price break on her medications.

Linda Rivera, proprietor of Pharmacy Progreso, greeted Cockrill like a relative. It was Cockrill's 10th visit, the third since her husband died a year ago.

Cockrill is fighting osteoporosis, high blood pressure and other ailments. She and Rivera talked about the latest prices of the pharmacy's generic and brand-name pills, which have Spanish labeling and the names of U.S. manufacturers.

Soon Cockrill plunked down about $220 in cash for several months' worth of medicine. She said she would have had to pay twice as much in Corpus Christi. With Medicare, Cockrill has no insurance coverage for prescription drugs.

"It seems like they are getting more than they should get," Cockrill said of the U.S. prices set by drug manufacturers.

She didn't need U.S. prescriptions to buy the pills from Rivera. And although returning to the United States with such medications is technically illegal, as is having medicine shipped in from Canada, no one questioned Cockrill about the contents of her mesh bag when she walked through a U.S. Customs and Border Protection turnstile into Texas and got back onto the bus with about 30 other shoppers.

It's a regular route for Cockrill, for an untold number of Houstonians and for hundreds of thousands of U.S. residents. For decades, Americans have bought prescription drugs from friendly, English-speaking vendors in Mexico for the same reason they bought liquor, jewelry and ceramics there. Cheap and easy is cheap and easy.

And the U.S. government usually looks the other way when the importation rules are broken by people with just enough medicine from Mexico or Canada for their own use.

But some things are changing in places like Nuevo Progreso, which lies between Matamoros and Reynosa, about seven hours by car from Houston.

As the price of prescription drugs has spiked in the United States, the pressure to find less expensive versions in Mexico has increased, according to experts. Now, as many as 40 percent of all U.S. residents who travel to Mexico return with purchased pharmaceuticals, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. They spend hundreds of millions of dollars.

Riding the wave, some pharmacies stand side by side in Nuevo Progreso. Some use catchy names like the "Almost Free Pharmacy" and the "U.S. Pharmacy." On wooden or metal stands on the sidewalk, their handwritten advertisements announce the availability of pills for all that ails Americans, including impotence, arthritis, heart problems and bacterial infections.

A few barkers beckon to tourists: "Pharmacy! Come in!"

In May, state Rep. Ron Wilson, D-Houston, gave recognition to this ingrained form of drug-running. He introduced legislation to make the Texas Department on Aging provide low-cost transportation for the elderly and others from Texas to the Mexican border pharmacies so they can save money on their medications.

The bill failed after a debate in which state Rep. Arlene Wohlgemuth, R-Burleson, said the state would be placing its elderly in harmful situations.

"We have no idea what they would be facing," she said.

The remark would raise a bilingual chuckle in Nuevo Progreso. Americans pack Mexico's streets with no signs of tension, especially on weekends and during the winter, when "snowbirds" from the northern United States live in Texas for a few months.

Besides, the kind of low-cost transportation sought by Wilson is already available on a limited basis. Cockrill arrived on a one-day charter bus jaunt from the Corpus Christi area that costs $20 for a round trip.

Rockport Tours runs the trips, which take place at least once a month and fill up weeks in advance, often attracting shoppers from Houston, according to the company. Shoppers ride on a modern, air-conditioned bus that offers complimentary refreshments and videos and patriotic U.S. stickers on the windshield.

"In case you don't already know about this little Mexican border town, Nuevo Progreso has become THE place to shop for prescriptions, vanilla, liquor, tobacco," Rockport Tours chirps on its Internet site.

But U.S. government and drug industry officials say there is danger in Nuevo Progreso -- inside the pill bottles and salve tubes that the flourishing pharmacies dispense.

"Looks can be deceiving. The medicine you buy across the borders may be unsafe or ineffective," the FDA warns in a leaflet that it recently started giving to U.S. residents entering Mexico and Canada. "Don't risk your health."

The FDA and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a private industry group, say that about a quarter of the medicines sold across the border are counterfeit. The FDA and the industry group work closely in the fight against counterfeit drugs, especially when the fakes make it into general circulation in the United States.

But, drug industry spokesman Mark Grayson said, "Our government is not responsible for the Mexican drug supply." So the government and the industry warn buyers of drugs in Mexico to beware.

Legitimate, noncounterfeit prescription drugs sold in Mexico are largely manufactured in Mexico, for consumption in Mexico, by U.S. manufacturers. The drugs are made outside the reach of FDA regulations, which is why, theoretically, they are not supposed to enter the United States.

Additionally, the FDA warns that people who obtain medicines without a prescription in Mexico can end up making judgments about dosage levels and drug combinations that instead should be made by their physicians.

AARP, formerly known as the American Association of Retired Persons, makes a similar argument, saying that cheap prices for drugs in Mexico are not worth the health risks.

But Pearl Hoffman, a retired "don't print my age" Kansas rancher, brushed aside the doubts as she stood at the counter at Pharmacy Progreso.

She said she recently went to her doctor in Rockport, where she spends the winters, and was tested for high blood pressure and diabetes. Her blood samples, she said, showed that the drugs she had bought in Mexico were keeping her illnesses under control. So she was back for more.

"It's the same companies -- their names are on the box," she said.

Hoffman said it was "just prudent" to make drug-buying trips to Mexico every two or three months because she saves half the cost of her medicines, which include expensive, cholesterol-lowering Zocor.

Hoffman said she, too, is a widow whose only health insurance coverage comes from Medicare.

"I don't know what to make of it," she said of U.S. prescription drug prices. "Everybody ought to pay their own way. But on the other hand, some people have to (either) eat or pay for their own medicines.

"I'm not at that point. But now I can come down here and save money and buy jewelry for my grandchildren."

U.S. drug companies charge less for their products in Mexico not because of lower manufacturing costs there, but because Mexicans who need the drugs have less money, industry spokesman Grayson said.

Also, prices are higher in the United States because that is where the drug companies recoup their costs for the research and development of new drugs, he said.

Critics say the industry spends heavily on marketing to doctors and the public, increasing the demand for the most expensive drugs and leading to higher profits.

Grayson said the low drug prices in Mexico are nothing to covet.

"Mexico is a developing-world country. Would you like their whole medical care, their whole standard of living?" he asked. "If that is the case, you can be in Mexico."

The Mexican government ducks the issue. Miguel Monterrubio, press secretary for the Mexican Embassy in Washington, D.C., said no one in the U.S. media had asked about prescription drug prices before and that he would need time to research the issue. He never responded to follow-up calls.

If President Bush gets his way, this debate will be moot -- and Nuevo Progreso will have to play up tequila or some other product as a chief income source.

With the Iraq war and a tax cut behind it, Congress this month is debating the president's $400 billion Medicare package, which would offer a prescription drug benefit through subsidies to private insurance companies. Each of the nation's 40 million Medicare beneficiaries could stay with the traditional plan and have no drug coverage or switch to one of two new plans offered by HMO-type companies.

Democrats say insurance coverage for drugs should be available through the traditional government plan to all of the elderly and disabled. Several Medicare reform plans by previous presidents have failed.

If a Medicare drug benefit plan of any type is passed -- and both major parties are facing political pressure to get that done -- people like Cockrill and Hoffman will have much less incentive to buy their medicines in Mexico.

But for now, Nuevo Progreso hums with commerce, music and sales pitches.

There is market competition between pharmacies, sometimes leading to 30 percent cuts in the already low prices, according to Sergio Zapata Narvaez of J.C. Pharmacy. His store on the main drag, called Benito Juarez Avenue, is typical. On one side of a long, narrow space, wooden shelves painted white hold neat stacks of white boxes that contain prescription drugs.

Some pharmacies buzzed with staffers in white lab coats who tapped on computer keyboards and consulted English and Spanish versions of the Physicians' Desk Reference, a drug encyclopedia. In other stores, sole attendants waited for business while watching black and white TV sets under wooden crucifixes attached to the walls.

Along with vendors who sell sunglasses, rings and toasted nuts, Nuevo Progreso offers medical and dental services, too. But physicians are hardly in evidence when customers in the pharmacies buy drugs that supposedly require prescriptions written by Mexican doctors.

At Pharmacy Progreso, pharmacist Rivera told Cockrill she would need a Mexican doctor's prescription for a medicine she wanted to buy. In a moment, Rivera handed over such a prescription, signed by a local doctor who had not examined Cockrill. Another worker explained later that the pharmacy has a doctor who serves as a medical adviser.

At the border crossing a few hundred yards away -- and at regulatory offices in Washington -- the laws about bringing prescription drugs into the U.S. likewise can be confusing and contradictory.

Some FDA documents say that importation is illegal and that people get away with it only because border agents -- who are also on the lookout for illegal immigrants and marijuana smuggling -- have leeway from the FDA to let in prescription drugs in amounts fit for personal use.

Other FDA documents say the importation of a 90-day supply of prescription drugs is perfectly legal as long as the buyer declares the purchase at the border, has a U.S. or Mexican prescription and is carrying the medicine in its original container.

"This has been confusing for us," said U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman Jim Michie.

With bags that bulged with medicine boxes, Cockrill and other passengers on the Rockport Tours bus returned to the U.S. side without border agents looking in their bags or asking them to declare their purchases.

On the Texas side of the international bridge for vehicles and pedestrians, near the city of Weslaco, at least one U.S. price is hard to beat.

All-day parking, for those who want to leave their vehicle in Texas and walk into Mexico to buy medication, is $1.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fda; prescriptiondrugs; seniors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: FITZ
Who was told "The peasants need bread...they're hungry" and she answered "Then let them eat cake"?

Marie Antonete (I probably miss-spelled that).

61 posted on 06/08/2003 6:36:25 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
Because Canada has a socialism based health care system, they buy the drugs in huge massive bulk. Since they do that, they can negotiate the prices down. They pass on those expenses by taxing the hell out of people.

Sadly, we in the US pay the R&D costs for the latest drugs. It isn't the socialization, its price controls in Canada. While I'm not one to favor price controls, I wouldn't mind if it were illegal to sell a drug in the US for a higher price than it is sold for elsewhere. I'm not saying to dictate how much any company can charge - I'm saying (or at least proposing) that drug makers cannot sell in the US for a price higher than the same product is sold elsewhere. That's all.

62 posted on 06/08/2003 6:53:10 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
What is your problem. Can't I just state my opinion which is almost the opinion of everyone on this site? If you differ fine. I am just going by experience. Hopefully nothing like that will never happen to you where you have to pay for your parent's medicine. I have empathy for seniors which I don't think is a bad thing. It was an experience for me to see the outrageous prices of medicine. If you don't believe it try having to buy 3 different kinds at once. Something I was not aware of because I never had to buy any for myself over the years until this year. I don't make alot of money and never did. I don't own a house, can't afford it, I rent and am leaving my apartment in July because of the rent increases in Westchester, NY. I lease a car (which was a stupid mistake on my part). I have taken a $13,000 a year cut in pay just to have a job after losing it right after Sept. 11th. October 5, 2001 to be exact. I am living from paycheck to paycheck right now but hopefuly when I move I will be able to save. I am just saying that people who go across to find cheaper medicine are doing something smart for themselves and their pocketbooks right now. There is nothing wrong with trying to save a buck or two. I don't understand why you can criticize someone you don't even know so easily!
63 posted on 06/08/2003 7:17:41 PM PDT by areafiftyone (The U.N. needs a good Flush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
That sounds like a good idea to me.
64 posted on 06/08/2003 7:18:28 PM PDT by areafiftyone (The U.N. needs a good Flush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Snowyman
There is an article out there, that details the cost of developing a new drug in the 60-70 million range, minus the government help like tax incentives and development grants.

I spent 27 years in pharmaceutical R&D. I guarantee that $60-70 million drugs are few and far between. $600-700 million is more like the average. And the cost of discovering the drug, where government labs or academia may play a part, is a minor part of the total cost. It is the 2 week, followed by 4 week, followed by one year, toxicology and pathology studies, each in 3 species, followed by lifetime (~3 year) carcinogenicity studies in rodents, and the phase I, II and III and sometimes IV clinical studies, none of which the government helps with that add up to hundreds of millions of dollars.

65 posted on 06/08/2003 7:18:40 PM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
We will probably get kicked off for these comments, but here goes.

I truly believe that the current medical crisis, facing many of the elderly, disabled, and the working poor, will be Hillary's ticket to the White House. I took my father-in-law to a Navy Ship reunion last week. I spent 4 days talking to WWII vets. They openly support Hillary and many are hopeful and believe whe will run and win in 2004. Their reasoning? Health care and prescription drugs.

The conservatives have a very short time left to pass a responsible national health care program. If they don't, the Democrats are going to be given the job.
66 posted on 06/08/2003 7:40:07 PM PDT by Bluewave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I am not criticising you but your words. For you personally I have nothing but sympathy and good wishes.

The prices for drugs are no more outrageous than those for food, clothes, cars, whatever else we use. These prices support someone else family just like your or mine.

67 posted on 06/08/2003 7:47:54 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: FairWitness
I'm not going to spend the time hunting up the $60-70 million story, but this along with others, was not hard to find. ( Google: drug development cost )

Drug prices in the United States are out of control, and rising.

http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/corp-focus/2002/000118.html


"The Tufts-industry estimate is for the cost of new chemical entities for which the industry was wholly responsible -- that is, where there was no substantial public contribution to R&D.

It turns out, however, that the vast majority of new drugs Big Pharma brings to market do not involve new chemical compounds. A May 2002 study by the National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHCM) Foundation found that two-thirds of the prescription drugs approved by the FDA between 1989 and 2000 were modified versions of existing medicines or identical to drugs already on the market (and only about 15 percent were both new and deemed by the FDA to provide significant improvement over existing medicines). Pharma denies it, but there is every reason to believe these less novel products are far cheaper to bring to market.

Then there's the not insignificant fact that the case of drugs brought to market without government support is the exception, not the norm. The federal government supports an enormous amount of research, and funds the earliest and riskiest portions of the R&D process: basic research and the earlier phases of clinical trials.

Finally, the Tufts-industry figures seem to wildly inflate the cost of clinical testing. Looking at company filings with the IRS for tax credits on research for "orphan drugs" (drugs which treat small populations), however, the Consumer Project on Technology found that --
adjusted for risk -- drug companies report expenditures of only $7.9 million on clinical trials, less than 1 percent of the overall estimate.

Even if the costs for this category of drug are below average, as the industry claims -- even if they were, implausibly, a tenth of the average -- this would still suggest a much lower total development cost than the Tufts-industry estimate."
68 posted on 06/08/2003 8:01:23 PM PDT by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Looks to me like the only real problem here is the existence of the FDA. Between pharm companies' presumed preference to not kill their customers and liability-suit provisions, medical care ought to survive de-Stalinization just fine.

Of course, we have a President who happily signed legislation to continue Welfare Farmer and steel-subsidy programs, so I'm not holding my breath for a little more freedom from Big Stupid Government.

69 posted on 06/08/2003 8:21:21 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
True story.

About 15 years ago, Xena's Mom (who weighs approximately 20 pounds less than me, at my height) and her best friend decided to visit a "fat doctor" they'd heard about in Ciudad Juarez or Nuevo Laredo or similar.

They went down there and got in. The doc poked Xena's Mom in the thigh and said, "Fluid retention," or something that sounded like that.

Then he gave them each a brown lunch bag FULL of pills - loose pills, not blister-packed or anything.

XM's Friend tried them and went temporarily blind for three days.

Moral: if you're looking for Phenergan, go to Mexico. If you're looking for a good diet plan, try Atkins.
70 posted on 06/08/2003 8:25:02 PM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Margie Cockrill, 76, is one of them. She crossed the Rio Grande on a luxury tour bus from Corpus Christi, wearing a purple pantsuit and a lapel pin in the colors of the American flag.

Note to Margie: purple does NOT match either red or blue.
71 posted on 06/08/2003 8:25:41 PM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Another true story.

Back in early '97, I and an ex-friend went down to Cancun.

The day we left, I woke up with a heinous sinus infection, and I unwisely took one of her prescribed pills, which turned out to be sulfa, to which I am deathly allergic.

I spent the entire flight, and the next two days, throwing up.

We found a doctor on Isla Mujeres who said he could make me better. He injected something into my hiney that did in fact cure the nausea, but it left a knot that I could feel three years later.

Draw your own lesson from this one, kids.
72 posted on 06/08/2003 8:28:47 PM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
That's okay. Well disgusted was the word I used when I saw my money going into the pharmacists hands. It was very disheartening to know that I had prescription insurance and still had a co-pay of 70.00! But I guess that was still better than paying full price for the medicines. You are correct in saying that price of alot of things are outrageous and not just perscriptions. I just wish there was a better way.
73 posted on 06/08/2003 8:35:58 PM PDT by areafiftyone (The U.N. needs a good Flush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
My conclusion is "Watch those Hiney doctors!". ;-) My sister got sick on a plane ride to Florida and threw up all over me and herself. Talk about projectile vomiting! I was never so grossed out on a flight. She could barely stop being sick all the way and we ended up spending hours in the airport when we landed waiting for her to get the strength enough to go to our hotel. Then she spent the rest of our vacation being sick from both ends. Finally at the end of the week she was well enough to walk around. Horrible experience when you are away from home to be sick. I don't know what she had but it was horrible.
74 posted on 06/08/2003 8:40:33 PM PDT by areafiftyone (The U.N. needs a good Flush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Snowyman
Pharma denies it, but there is every reason to believe these less novel products are far cheaper to bring to market.

Less novel products are a safer bet to develop since they are a bit less apt to have surprise toxicities. But any chemical change at all is defined as a new chemical entity (it will have different chemical precursors, and a different route of synthesis) that must go through all the same toxicity and clinical tests. And these are by far more expensive than the basic research the government supports that you and others have been led to believe is such a big part of the equation. And more often than you might believe, adding one methyl group to an old compound, which is about the simplest modification you can make, can at the end of 3-4 years and hundreds of millions of dollars of studies, prove to have been a toxic or tumorigenic modification.

If you could force current drug prices down by 50%, which is what the trips to Canada and Mexico make you think can be done, you could say goodbye to anything remotely close to the current level of bringing innovative new medicines to market, and I suspect most who are complaining about prices would still be complaining.

And yes, I agree that it is very difficult or impossible for some of the elderly to afford prescription drugs. But consider that they have probably never paid anything to insurance during the years they did not need the drugs. Doesn't matter if that is not their fault. The only way that kind of insurance, or almost any kind of insurance, can work is if you pay for it long before you need it. So we must resign ourselves I suppose to the Federal government taking the responsibility. Thats what happens when we (collectively) do not plan ahead

75 posted on 06/08/2003 8:55:33 PM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
If on Interstate 8, on the AZ/CA line, head west for a minute or two until you see the exit for Algodones Rd. Turn off, and head south. There's a small border crossing with several pharmacies, as well as some awesome chips and margaritas at the restaurant over to the right, just before crossing back to the US side. It's a lot cheaper than the bigger, well-known crossings. If you cross in the Fall or Winter months, all of the American (and Canadian) snowbirds are quite knowledgeable.

76 posted on 06/08/2003 9:04:33 PM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (Thousands have died for my freedom; only One has died for my soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Well, like I said, I opted for the second highest deductible, $1500.00 (no, that's NOT a typo) with a maximum $2500 out of pocket expense per year. That's how I managed to keep my premium down to less than $350/month. Given the way cost have kept shooting up, I figured that I would only have been able to keep paying for my health insurance for another 10 years or so at most. By that time, I should have had my house paid for, and would probably have to sell the house to continue my health insurance...

Mark
77 posted on 06/08/2003 9:23:25 PM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
Simple question, why don't we use the free market system?

Good question, Sonny. The simple answer is the medical lobby, which pumps millions into Washington won't allow it.

If there was a real free(capitalist)system, the Govt. wouldn't care less how much you paid for Doctor prescribed drugs.

The way it is now, is because of the powerful medical lobby making you pay thru the nose.

Regards

78 posted on 06/09/2003 1:19:03 AM PDT by biffalobull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I think that instead of going accross the border for medicine, we should do something about liberalising drug dispensation and stopping this government welfare medical care fraud that allows people not to look at prices to buy their medicines.
79 posted on 06/09/2003 2:25:36 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biffalobull
"I'm sure if your Govt. took some of the billions it spends on the military.."

Yes, but then who would defend Canada?

I do have some sort of health care. I pay for it, just like I pay for all of my other expenses of daily living. I don't expect the government to take care of me.

Regards to you, serf.
80 posted on 06/09/2003 9:23:27 AM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson