[bootless]

...and he is alleged to have killed only a few.

And that makes it right? Where is the bright line for an acceptable number of deaths? Three is OK, four is not? We are ALL our Father's children. Why would He weep less for three than for a hundred?

[F.J. Mitchell]

His alleged victims were aiders and abettors of monsters that have collectively slain over a hundred million. Does having the blessings of Nine enablers dressed in black robes make their atrocities alright.

Don't start throwing our Father into this argument, and how he loves all his children and weeps for one just as much as for a hundred. Our Father is surely weeping for the hundred million babies that despicable people have proclaimed to be non-human, and unworthy to live and murdered on a wholesale scale, as we law abiding citizens stood by wringing our hands and doing nothing except whining and quickly condemning anyone who made some futile attempt to end it.

How much longer can we exist with heads in the sand, ignoring the screams of our conscience and pretend that everything is okay, while larger and larger percentages of each new generation are assinated before ever drawing a breath?