Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas
But, the committees largely do not serve a noble purpose; they serve to block bills.

True, but rather than do away with committees, just limit their powers. It's a good thing to have smaller groups go over the detail, hold hearings, etc., and to summarize and present recommendations to the full House. But they should be given a strict timetable, with a requirement that committe reports are due on a specified date -- no killing the bill stalling it in committee. Fail to deliver the report, and the House will vote on it without the committee's recommendations.

88 posted on 06/04/2003 8:27:50 AM PDT by kevkrom (Dump the income tax -- support an NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom
Good idea. I knew not having committees would be an issue in some respects with difficulty in streamlining things.

Your solution is much more reasonable......

It would be nice to see Bush push for it. Just once I would like to see every bill get voted on by the full floor of both houses. What the heck are our elected officials doing all day when they seem to barely scratch the surface on the number of introduced bills?
100 posted on 06/04/2003 11:11:34 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (Blessed be the Lord, the God of Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson