Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 666beast
I'm confused about his statement about Martha Stewart: "So, she lied. So what?"

HUH?!

294 posted on 06/06/2003 4:37:41 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]


To: bootless
I don't understand Mike about Stewart. He seems to me to be trying to take a different route when discussing her than the other conservatives. I think it's a boring topic, I'd rather not hear about and just see the pics of her behind bars.
295 posted on 06/06/2003 4:43:00 PM PDT by BUSHdude2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

To: bootless
What I heard was that her minor monetary violation did not warrant a huge sentence, huge fine, jail time and humiliation.

Especially, when Hillary made more money off of cattle futures and nothing came of it. That's called "one rule for the president and one for the resident."

Mike also said that this case could hurt Bush and the Republicans. Did you happen to see the cover of USA today??? It had a picture of Martha Stewart looking sad and right next to it a picture of Hillary talking about how hard it was to write her book. The pics were so close, they could've been Siamese twins joined at the hip since the photos were from the waist up.
296 posted on 06/06/2003 4:44:14 PM PDT by 666beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson