To: desertcry
It takes time.I suppose that puts you on the "give the U.N. inspectors more time" side of the issue? I was a hawk, based on the constant assurance of WMD's. WMD's that I was asured would end up used against us if we didn't move immediately to rid Iraq of them.. I'm gonna be real pissed if it turns out I was lied to. And it's really beginning to look that way.
261 posted on
06/02/2003 8:11:20 PM PDT by
templar
To: templar
I'm gonna be real pissed if it turns out I was lied to. And it's really beginning to look that way.And every day that passes without finding any WMDs means more people come to your conclusion. I am seriously wondering what they (the Bush administration) were thinking.
Did they believe that they could brazen this through because enouh people worshipped the man?
264 posted on
06/02/2003 8:18:30 PM PDT by
Mike4Freedom
(Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
To: templar
...puts you on the "give the UN inspectors more time" side of the issue. No, what the UN wanted is not just more time, but infinite time. Iraq is as large as California and it woun't take but a baseball diamond size of an area to hide enough Bio-chem WMD to kill a million Americans. How many baseball diamond field do you think can fit in Iraq? A needle in a haystack right? Besides, the WMDs most probably have been transported to other countries (Syria, Iran, perhaps even in France by now.) How long have we had boots on the ground in Iraq? So have some patience and some faith in our Team. In the meantime the crow is being tenderized for the opposition(from within and without)to swallow. Meanwhile ask yourself this question: Why did saddam kicked the UN inspectors out years ago and paid a heavy price for it, if he had no intention of having WMD?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson