To: AntiGuv
What I am arguing is that the preponderance of the evidence now strongly suggests that anything they may have was absurdly trivial compared to what they were alleged to have.Then your knowledge of CB warfare and by extension, terrorism, is sadly lacking and your opinion should be considered ill informed.
To: jwalsh07
Then your knowledge of CB warfare and by extension, terrorism, is sadly lacking and your opinion should be considered ill informed.Exactly.
146 posted on
06/01/2003 12:01:44 PM PDT by
Peach
To: jwalsh07
Quite the contrary, my knowledge of CB warfare & research is as impeccable as it gets - take that to the bank. And, I understand precisely what the implications would be of the alleged intelligence information publicized prior the war. Similarly, I now understand exactly just how far from reality those allegations must deviate..
154 posted on
06/01/2003 12:08:45 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson