Then we would have all been consistantly conned since 1998. That's when the UN released their report that the weapons of mass destruction existed in the quantities referenced by Bush. It was also the basis on which Clinton, and the democrat congress, decided to bomb Iraq. Where do you suppose those known stockpiles went? Do you really think Saddam disposed of them AFTER the weapons inspectors left? Do you really think Saddam bribed the weapons inspectors because they knew he disposed of them? Do you think Saddam refused to reveal he disposed of the WMD's because he really wanted us to come in and depose him?
You'd really have to have some kind of convoluted thinking to believe you were lied to.
As P.T. Barnum said, "You can fool some of the people all of the time, you can fool most of the people most of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" (or maybe that was Bob Dylan, I forget sometimes).
My "convoluted thinking" is just evidence that I'm not most of the people most of the time. And I absolutely do not like being fooled (lied to) any of the time.
All I want to do is see some of this HUGE QUANTITY of weapons Bush absolutely assured us Saddam had. That's all I'm asking. I don't think that's an unreasonable request, since it's what led me to support him and what I was led to believe I would get to justify supporting the War.