Replies

Then legally should not the Rochas have gone through the legal system to get these items?

I saw footage of them taking rattaan chairs. That is that important? Sorry I do not understand.

I can understand wanting her diplomas and very personal items but they carted off it looked like what they could.

In my opinion they looted the Peterson home. No matter how uncoopertive the Petersons were it does not give Rochas' the right to load up seven rigs with household items.

I am dissapointed that MPD did not put and end to it. The court should seal the house off to all involved and go through probate like the rest of America would be required to.

If I allowed my emotions to get in the way and took back things from someone I would be in a jail cell.

I really do feel for the Rochas loss but crossing the line is not acceptable civil behaviour.

Are you saying that Peterson's have rights and the Rocha's have none? Laci is still on title as a joint owner. There has been no probate and no death certificate. The chair was a rocking chair that Laci has bought to rock the baby when she brought him home. Frankly, this situation is not the norm. The Peterson's have done as they pleased. They have shown not ONE bit of DECENCY in this situation. The Rochas's ASKED many times for 22 things that were Laci's. IMO they shouldn't have had to ask twice!! When it comes to the FINAL disposition of the entire property, yes, that will be a Court proceeding. A bloody Power of Attorney does NOT give the Peterson's ownership rights. Besides, NONE of us know whether Laci had a Will in which she stipulated certain items to given as bequests to certain memebers of her family or his for that matter. I think we should all STOP this stupid conversation because NONE of us know the nitty gritty details. However, it's clear to me that Snott Peterson is a very greedy person and after viewing the actions of his mother and father, I can see why.