"The[y] said they had faxed the Peterson's and their attorney four times with no response."
The night Sharon Rocha was on Greta, she knew that a deal had been made to allow her to enter the Peterson home. How can she say that they were upset that they were not allowed inside Laci's house and in the same breath say that they have tried repeatedly to contact the Peterson's and their attorney with no response?
The agreement was infact in place at the very moment she was making these claims and had been prior to her appearance. She was a participant in the negotiations that resulted in the agreement. She knew an agreement to enter Laci's home had already been made. A better example of a disengenuous statement would be hard to find.
The morning following her appearance on Greta, Rocha's own attorney says that she was upset that Gergaros had withdrawn the defense's agreement that very morning.