[norton]

Good Lord people - get a grip!

Over 340 responses and nearly all have convicted Scott Peterson based on hostile reaction to his lawyer, sympathy for a pregnant woman,rumor, innuendo, partial and well-spun news reports, lack of anything better to do, or just inate hostility.

Innocent until proven....remember?

We must have caught a virus from OJ and WJC...I certainly believe that they got off from real crimes and got off for reasons other than law or reason. But, since that time "we" have convicted every accused citizen the media has handed us for consideration. "We" have done so without a shred of certain evidence (ah, but remember the watch case, remember the concrete, remember the ides of march).

I don't know who killed this woman, I DO know people in SP's position who were entirely capable of innocently doing most or all of the dumb things alleged of him...going out on a small boat by himself instead of hanging around with his pregnant wife(just possibly on edge over pregnancy, Christmas, and Amber...).

Dumb and probably feeling guilty about infidelity does not prove guilt...sorry about that.

As to property and the families. "We" were totally in support of the Levy family who in all honesty did everything they could to prove themselves damaged if not demented. Now 'we' are standing behind a family that (yes folks, like it or not) burglarized not only a home but a crime scene. They did so after the other side had agreed to and begun to provide specific requested items AND a tour of the house to the burglars. SEVEN truck loads??

Note here that the Peterson's don't appear to be using or benefiting from the house, it's been locked up and silent but for controlled visits.

Take a deep breath and then try to give Peterson or any other less than perfect example of humanity the same breaks you'd expect if you walked into a tragedy without an airtight alibi.

[Jackie-O]

You must have missed the thread the other night..over 1000 posts long! This one is teeney compared to some... ;0)

[spectre]

He did it...norton :~)

sw

[Canadian Outrage]

*groan* there is no point answering YOUR post. It's wrong from beginning to end. I'm glad I have to go grocery shopping. Otherwise, I might lose it. The Rocha's are NOT damaged or demented. They out and out victims of a horrendous crime.

[RGSpincich]

They did so after the other side had agreed to and begun to provide specific requested items AND a tour of the house to the burglars.

Wrong. The other side reneged on the agreement.

The Rochas have a key and free access to the house in the absence of Laci and SP per prior agreements with them. No legal action was taken by Petersons to secure the property from entry by the Rochas. The proper legal thing to do for the Petersons was to get a court order barring the Rochas and have it legally served and a hearing held. The Petersons were never legally in complete control of the house and the Rochas were never legally barred from entering.

The Rochas had tried to cooperate with the Petersons but the the Petersons attempted to exercise unfounded control. Rochas put it to the test, nothing underhanded here. No midnight burglary, it was broad daylight with media thick as flies recording the whole thing.

The items taken for safe keeping were cataloged and that inventory was given to the police officer on the scene. Hardly theft.

[runningbear]

we are not the court Norton... we are people of public opinions.. So, our comments are not admissible in the courts....LOL>.. Howdy!!

[Devil_Anse]

Thank goodness you're here! We were all so lost, just reading all the media reports... such as the one that said the Petersons told the defense counsel they could stay in the house while in Modesto.