Replies

I still see no evidence that is a slam-dunk to convict - unless you know something the rest of us don't, and if THAT is case, where were YOU on Christmas Eve???? ;0)

As I've stated, early and often, I really hate Trial By Media - I've never claimed Scott Peterson to be a good person (it's obvious he isn't), but this latest incident doesn't show anyone involved in a good light...

I am not saying it is a "slam-dunk" concerning what we know. I have to believe the police have much more including forensics. Laci was ruled a homicide before she was ever found, after police spent 2 days in that house. Chandra Levy was never ruled a homicide until she was found.

I will not be a candidate for the jury, because I don't live in CA. I can have an opinion and it is this; I believe SP is guilty just on his horrid behavior from the moment his wife went missing. Calling your mistress and saying "I want to spend my life with you" when the entire country is out looking for your wife sounds as cold as it gets. Even if he was at a loss of romantic feelings for Laci (it happens in the best of marraiges), if he cared about her as a human being the girlfriend would not be top priority when Laci was missing not to mention hihs baby.

I confess I could not be an "open minded juror" on this case.
I think the guy is a sociopath (I believe that is the term Mark Geragoes called him on one show before he took the case saying "if he did this" while insisting the police should be getting an arrest warrant for SP).