[Godebert]

No need to clarify You can assume whatever you want. You've already prejudged me, so it really doesn't make any difference.

Taking the fifth, eh? This isn't a court of law....you can answer the question without fear of prosecution. However, anything you say can an WILL be used against you in the court of Freeper public opinion, so it's understandable how you are rather hesitant to admit to being a supporter of legalized murder.

[Catspaw]

Harassing me, huh? Here it is: it's none of your business.

[rebel]

DO we have to stay within "the system" to stop "legalized murder"?

As a devil's advocate: If "legalized murder" doesn't get us out of the box what would?

[MEG33]

This thread was about the possible capture of an indicted but not yet tried bombing suspect.How on earth did it come to this?

[codercpc]

I am sorry, but regardless of catspaws personal views, you are an obtuse, moron.

If this gets me in trouble, I do not regret it. How does his/her personal views have anything to do with this conversation. If catspaw is discussing how incredibly disgusting it is for a human being to allegedly bomb innocent people (I know abortion clinics do the same, in a different manner), that is the conversation.Whoever did the bombings and if he/she has been caught is the issue.

Nazi death camps, abortionists moral crimes etc. are not the issue. This issue is bombing multiple sites. I am in no way saying he is guilty, I don't know nearly enough about the case, I will wait for the trial.

Again someones pro-life, pro-choice views have no place in these conversations.

BTW I am pro-life, so don't bother to ask.