[Miss Marple]

No one is saying it wasn't the main reason. What is aggravating is that people will not understand that we have found plenty of signs that the WMD's were there, that it is possible that they were destroyed or moved right before the war, that we will probably locate them in due time, and that they were there in 1992! Saddam never provided proof of their destruction. So, where are they?

[Captain Kirk]

"one of many reasons" is the term being used by revisionist freepers. Is that denying that it was the main reason? I suppose not technically, if one speaks Clintonese.