Don't be so ambivilent. Why don't you state what the correlation rates between monozygotic and dizygotic twins were found to be? They're quite different. With little variation, monozygotic twins have a correlation of about 1 in 2, dizygotic twins only 1 in 5.
Again, you're making a blatantly dishonest representation. The reasons why are obvious. The studies don't support your conclusions. But somehow, by amazing contortions of logic, you're able to convince yourself that the studies actually draw a conclusion exactly opposite of what they conclude by any objective analysis.
Bwhahahaaa...stop I can't take it anymore. My side is hurting.
What is so dishonest. A greater than 1 in 5 rate for homosexality is quite significant. That's a greater than 4 times increase in the normal rate. You are the one being blatantly dishonest by saying 'only'.