Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks
On the contrary, I am quite familiar with them, Mr. Condescending. As such, I know you're only presenting the studies that tend to support your particular prejudice.

How about the 1993 study from Arizona State University, Tempe that states "[The] findings are interpreted as supporting the argument for a biological basis in sexual orientation."

58 posted on 06/02/2003 5:03:00 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams
On the contrary, I am quite familiar with them, Mr. Condescending. As such, I know you're only presenting the studies that tend to support your particular prejudice.

No Susan I’m presenting real peer reviewed reseach studies that have a 0% concordance rate. Explain that for us Einstein.

62 posted on 06/02/2003 5:17:01 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
How about the 1993 study from Arizona State University, Tempe that states "[The] findings are interpreted as supporting the argument for a biological basis in sexual orientation."

Do you know the difference between DATA and conclusion? Apparently not.

BTW does this study have a source or was it preformed by the science building at ASU?

66 posted on 06/02/2003 5:27:23 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson