[EdReform]

---

To: ArGee

There has been a change recently to normalize homosexuality...done with violence and threats combined with a general effort to cover up the facts.

You are really looking through a delusional and conspiratorial set of lenses. It's almost amuzing.

180 posted on 06/03/2003 7:42 AM PDT by tdadams

---

Like I said, so much for independent thinking and admiration of a well reasoned argument... Or is that one of those "iron sharpens iron" ploys?

As has been well documented on Free Republic, ArGee is correct about the change to normalize homosexuality.

[tdadams]

Let's just be clear, Ed. Nothing I say is going to be greeted by you as well reasoned. Argee's claim that I responded to in #180 sounded irrationally conspiratorial to me and I stated so. You apparently took that as a denigration even though it wasn't.

[scripter]

I like to give folks the benefit of the doubt up to a point. I recently reached that point with tdadams after he complained about a book summary:

Her summations are, how to say it, a bit propagandistic.

tdadams made this claim without ever reading the book. I ordered the book and when it arrived, asked tdadams what pages he would like scanned for clarity in context. He obfuscated, over and over.

After that I posted the first of 62 progagandistic summaries in context and he complained I merely posted the most inoccuous summary. Hey, I was just starting at the beginning since tdadams wouldn't provide a specific number so we can see if he was right about the summary.

Numerous times after that tdadams simply refused to provide a specific reference or page number. I simply wasn't going to waste my time scanning in random summaries of the 62 points if tdadams was only going to state whatever I posted was merely an innocuous summary. It was obvious tdadams only interest was in obfuscating the issue.

Unless, of course, tdadams wants to provide a specific reference from 2 to 62 and I'll be more than happy to scan in the respective page numbers.