I've come to understand you have a reactive need to protest when you're shown to be wrong, but come on. Are you trying to convince me that you're completely incapable of an honest assertion?
Nice try but it clearly shows how you said my DATA was wrong "thus shattering your risible argument and your DATA had a "higher correlation" was right. Even an eight year-old can see that.
So now that's settled let's go on to #2. He cites studies he wont cite.
Why do you say there were other studies that support your conclusion but won't cite which studies they are?