Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: twntaipan; IncPen; Judith Anne
May want to check out this ref in Lancet:

http://pdf.thelancet.com/pdfdownload?uid=llan.361.9368.original_research.25515.1&x=x.pdf

Its a retospective study of SARS infected Hong Kong healthcare workers-looked at what protective gear they wore, and determined what measures were most likely to protect against infection.

Turns out that simple surgical mask and gowning ( N 95 mask not necessary) was probably sufficient protection.

This is valuable info going forward as we look for sensible and economical means to deal with suspect cases.
155 posted on 05/29/2003 3:55:57 PM PDT by BartMan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: BartMan1
Wah! Bartman1! I can't get in without a password!
157 posted on 05/29/2003 4:10:21 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: bonesmccoy
Courtesy ping...
159 posted on 05/29/2003 7:27:59 PM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: BartMan1
I take exception to your post that N95 masks aren't necessary. Otherwise, thank you for posting...
161 posted on 05/29/2003 8:24:42 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson