Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaxRelief
The statement made on this website bothers me, if true. Perhaps you could lookk at his research and numbers, and let me know what you think... You can link to his charts and conclusions about the situation in other countries as well.

I do not assume every source on the net is accurate, of course. I look for more information. The statement by that fool in West Virginia really bothered me, when considered along with the US info posted at the link above.

http://www.lassesen.com/sars/usa.htm
132 posted on 05/29/2003 1:50:24 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: jacquej
Consider this comment for Canada's Dr. Low excerpted from an Atlanta news source...

"Low said health officials were likely to designate more patients as probable cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome when they apply the international definition of the diagnosis to the new outbreak, which was first noticed last week. "

... then, consider that in light of the comment about US reporting methods found in the link on the above thread of mine
136 posted on 05/29/2003 1:57:27 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: jacquej
There are so many reliable sources of better, less interpreted SARS information, it really is not worth the time to check the validity of vanity sites. Refer to my post above. Dr. Preiser is one of the key researchers, and he is in the immediate loop.
151 posted on 05/29/2003 3:08:04 PM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson