Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Filibuster_60
China probably doesn't have suitcase nukes.

Good point, though this is disputable. The Chinese may consider miniaturization technology more vital for terrorist use than for MIRVing, in which case they might refrain from mounting more warheads on an ICBM, for now, in order to prevent us from discovering their capabilities.

...it's ridiculous to say that before Clinton, China's missiles could "barely reach Taiwan."

Thank you for the correction. You are right, of course. I have fixed the error in the other published versions of this column, on NewsMax.com and RichardPoe.com.

16 posted on 05/26/2003 2:42:19 PM PDT by Richard Poe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Richard Poe
Corrected version...

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, China presented little threat to the United States. Chinese missiles "couldn’t hit the side of a barn," notes Timothy W. Maier of Insight magazine. Few could reach North America and those that made it would likely miss their targets.


19 posted on 05/26/2003 2:56:25 PM PDT by Richard Poe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Richard Poe; HighRoadToChina; ntrulock; lavaroise; Noswad; Paul Ross; Jeff Head; swarthyguy
Richard, your article is getting some visibility and is very timely. Thank's for doing this; it's nice to have the "executive summary" version of this sordid tale.
29 posted on 05/27/2003 9:02:56 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson