Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sarcasm
I know that the current unemployment rate is high, but it is lower than almost any other nation. We had terrorist attacks that crippled the airline industry, tourist industry, depressed consumers confidence, etc...

To be honest, I am surprised at how robust our nation is and proud of Americans for making a comeback (albiet right now a weak one, but we survived a lot). What I am trying to say is that I don't think trade barriers will help our ecomony and that if we get to 5% GDP, unemployment would not be a problem. A robust ecomony means full employment.

9 posted on 05/25/2003 4:11:40 AM PDT by BushCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: BushCountry
Your statement was that 5% unemployment represents full-employment. That statement is factually incorrect. The United States has had much lower levels of unemployment for extended periods.
10 posted on 05/25/2003 4:17:29 AM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BushCountry
A robust ecomony means full employment.

We are in the middle of a geosynchronous slowdown in economic activity. Both Japan and Germany could soon slip into severe recessions with France, the UK, Canada, Mexico, and Asia not far behind. Even China is suffering from banking problems and a lack of domestic demand coupled with high unemployment. Using the hot media word "robust" to describe anything economic today just doesn't apply.

Richard W.

15 posted on 05/25/2003 4:28:39 AM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BushCountry
"To be honest, I am surprised at how robust our nation is and proud of Americans for making a comeback (albiet right now a weak one, but we survived a lot). What I am trying to say is that I don't think trade barriers will help our ecomony and that if we get to 5% GDP, unemployment would not be a problem. A robust ecomony means full employment."

I love the idea of challenging my fellow capitalists on this one. If you could have an across the board tax cut of 20 plus percent with an increase in tariffs of 3% to offset the cut (in demospeak that is) OR maintain the status quo, which would you prefer? If you cut the taxes dramatically, I gurantee an economic explosion which would not be injured by the increase in tariffs because the spending power would mulitiply faster than the inflation rate ever could.
39 posted on 05/25/2003 5:29:38 AM PDT by Beck_isright (When Senator Byrd landed on an aircraft carrier, the blacks were forced below shoveling coal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BushCountry
You talk about "trade barriers," while the country suffers from Free Trade--the god created by Jack Welsh (remember him, "Neutron Jack:" the buildings are standing, but all the people are gone...)

The issue, my man, is FAIR trade; whereby tariffs represent the premium paid by US manufacturers to comply with FLMA, EPA, EEO, and IRS (to name the leaders...)

146 posted on 05/25/2003 4:42:59 PM PDT by ninenot (Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson