To: sarcasm
Just the opposite is shown. The funny thing is that the overall percentage of adult working greatly increased from 47% to 67%. That is why you are comparing apples to oranges, we have millions upon millions more adults working now (as a percentage of the adult population of the United States) as opposed to the glory years.
To: BushCountry
The percentage of the population in the workforce is an indication of stagnant or declining real wages for a substantial portion of the population. Many women were forced into the workforce to make ends meet.It does not diminish the fact that the average unemployment rate has been increasing.
25 posted on
05/25/2003 4:45:36 AM PDT by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: BushCountry
That is why you are comparing apples to oranges, we have millions upon millions more adults working now (as a percentage of the adult population of the United States) as opposed to the glory years. You mean the years when one wage could support one family?
29 posted on
05/25/2003 5:00:20 AM PDT by
A. Pole
To: BushCountry
Interesting observation.
The massive influx of women into the workforce (beginning around 1968) has had a substantial impact on the cost of labor---DOWNWARD--and has made the phrase "family-supporting job" into a quaint antiquity.
147 posted on
05/25/2003 4:56:11 PM PDT by
ninenot
(Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson