[oceanperch]

What did she share?

I would think that it was the wrong thing to do.

Knowing how the media mixes words did she actually say "gift".

She has asked for her privacy and doesn't want to re live this early part of her life. I think folks should respect her right to privacy.

[AnAmericanMother]

The ONLY reason the media is jumping on this is to try to excuse their idol, Bill Clinton, by associating him in the public mind with Saint Jack.

That was the reason that the Thomas Jefferson/Sally Hemings story got such air play (later shown to be most unlikely, but the media trumpeted it as a "DNA match". Of course it was no such thing, and Jefferson's younger brother Randolph was a much more likely suspect.) After all, if one of the founding fathers had a liaison with a . . . gasp . . . slave woman, then what Billy Jefferson did wasn't so bad . . . right?

But the Kennedy story adds the mix of Camelot, plus the congruence is even closer . .. an actual intern.

Once the Clinton apologists fade away, this woman will be able to get back to a somewhat normal life.

I wish, however, that everybody didn't seem to be gloating about it and calling it a "gift". A dignified silence or "we do not wish to comment" would be so much more appropriate.