Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JudgemAll
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 US 186 (1986) The Constitution does not confer a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy.

BURGER, C.J., Concurring Opinion Decisions of individuals relating to homosexual conduct have been subject to state intervention throughout the history of Western civilization. Condemnation of those practices is firmly rooted in Judeo-Christian moral and ethical standards. Homosexual sodomy was a capital crime under Roman law.... During the English Reformation, when powers of the ecclesiastical courts were transferred to the King's Courts, the first English statute criminalizing sodomy was passed.... Blackstone described "the infamous crime against nature" as an offense of "deeper malignity" than rape, a heinous act "the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature," and "a crime not fit to be named." W. Blackstone, Commentaries . The common law of England, including its prohibition of sodomy, became the received law of Georgia and the other Colonies. In 1816, the Georgia Legislature passed the statute at issue here, and that statute has been continuously in force in one form or another since that time. To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.

Thomas Jefferson on Sodomy Sect. XIV. Whosoever shall be guilty of rape, polygamy, or sodomy* with a man or woman, shall be punished; if a man, by castration, a woman, by boring through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch in diameter at the least. Peterson, Merrill D. "Crimes and Punishments" Thomas Jefferson: Writings Public Papers (Literary Classics of the United States, Inc. 1984) pp. 355, 356.

Hundreds rally for '10 Commandments judge' Moore wrote a separate concurring opinion, repudiating homosexuality on religious grounds, calling it "abhorrent, immoral, detestable, a crime against nature, and a violation of the laws of nature and of nature's God."

103 posted on 05/15/2003 7:34:14 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Remedy
Remedy, please don't take this as a personal attack, I am attacking the absolutly assinine statement from the court you quoted...

Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 US 186 (1986) The Constitution does not confer a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy.

The above quote continues to show the absolute ignorance of our judiciary and most Citizens... The Constitution does not confer rights to anyone or anything except to the State or Federal government. These entities don't exist without the Constitution (though they are operating as if there is none right now, but that's a different conversation).

Even still, I guess I am changing the subject. To be clear again...Sodomy is wrong, evil, against God, etc.... and the family and the church need to get back to basics...but...

You have just as much right "in reference to the Constitution" to stick your tounge on an electric socket, (excuse the crudity, but I'm trying to get a point across) to put your nuts in a vise, or to perform the (disturbing)act of sodomy.

They are all stupid and wrong, but if I as an individual don't have the "jurisdiction" to enter your property and stop you from doing these things, I can not (in the form of a "government") confer that right to others...





104 posted on 05/15/2003 7:56:13 PM PDT by borntodiefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson