Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Having re-read all the documents, and noticing AGAIN the "NO" (for number of days!) spoken of above ...

I cannot find this in any of the documents. Can you link to it?

I SEE the specific paperwork that shows he DID get approval for training out-of-state, and that he DID do it by getting active duty credit for that period.

Bush's request for transfer (in May 1972), then the acceptance of the transfer (also in May 1972), then the denial of the transfer (suspiciously hard to read date?), then acceptance of 2nd request, which is not proof that he did the time. Bush's military history, which makes no mention of AL. Bush doing his time in 1973, not 1972, and not in AL. What does this say, except that he certainly wasn’t doing his time in Texas from May 1972 to April 1973? This says they thought he was in AL, but is still not proof.

Are you claiming (somehow) that "boilerplate" paragraphs (about not missing assignments) "prove" he missed assignments?

As I said earlier, El Gato called the misrepresentation of that one in an earlier post. Not all articles misrepresented it, however.
209 posted on 05/15/2003 2:34:24 PM PDT by Egregious Philbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: Egregious Philbin
This document from your references (For 1973 (?) - and why is it relevent at all in your crusade I don't know ?) has the "NO" used properly as a "header" to the "9" for April 73 duty days.

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc17.gif

Again: Show me some documents that indicate Bush missed training days in the period Oct and Nov of 1972. These all show he was working in 1973 ...

You have shown me nothing to back up your claims.

---...---

I don't believe ANY national democrat politician - regardless of whether they are under oath or not, after they claim ignorance or "I don't remember" several thousand times infornt of Congress while trying to investigate Clinton's bribes and treasonous sale of military/commercial secrets to China.

Are you going to claim "Barnes" statement is somehow relevent and "truthful" without any backup or evidence that it was actually somehow "evil" or "reprehensible", while claiming Bush is flat out lying when he says he (Bush) was on active duty in Alabama?

Asking for an appointment in the ANG ISN'T illegal, by the way.

Taking millions in foreign money is illegal.
212 posted on 05/15/2003 2:51:10 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I support FR monthly; and ABBCNNBCBS (continue to) Lie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson