To: TomB
The Lincoln was NOT in sight of San Diego when the S-3 landed. It was about 35 miles away, well beyond the horizon.
12 posted on
05/10/2003 11:50:05 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Travis McGee
From the deck it may well have been visible, still only a smudge though.
Where was her hilarity when X42 was diddling interns?
Joanna, I accept your apology, now get with the program.
MOVE! MOVE! MOVE!
15 posted on
05/10/2003 11:55:17 AM PDT by
tet68
(Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
To: Travis McGee
The Lincoln was NOT in sight of San Diego when the S-3 landed. It was about 35 miles away, well beyond the horizon. Are you trying to tell us that the Earth is not flat? ;-)
19 posted on
05/10/2003 12:06:27 PM PDT by
Polybius
To: Travis McGee
The Lincoln was NOT in sight of San Diego when the S-3 landed. It was about 35 miles away, well beyond the horizon.Absolutely, positively, 100% correct Travis. Cameras were not "placed" so the shoreline couldn't be seen as some libs are claiming. Only demorats would be bold enough to pull some sort of stunt like that.
If land was in site, does anyone not think that a least one camerman CBS, CNN, NBC, or ABC would've zoomed in on the coast if he had the chance?
26 posted on
05/10/2003 12:31:13 PM PDT by
b4its2late
(Who the hell wants to hear actors talk? - H. M. Warner (1881-1958), Warner Brothers founder)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson