Posted on 05/10/2003 12:49:11 AM PDT by kattracks
May 10, 2003 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- UNITED NATIONS - With the U.N. Security Council looking to avoid the bitter divisions that broke out before the war, France and Russia toned down objections to a new U.S. plan for ruling postwar Iraq, but appeared intent to seek changes to give the United Nations a stronger role.
The United States introduced a wide-ranging draft resolution that would give the U.N. stamp of approval for a U.S.-British occupation of Iraq for at least a year and hand the Americans and British control of the country's oil wealth to use in rebuilding the country.
"Most delegations saw this as charting a way forward; certainly they had some questions," U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte said Friday after a council session where he introduced the eight-page resolution, co-sponsored by Britain and Spain.
With debate in the council due to start Wednesday, there were differences among the members over a vision to rebuild Iraq - but the tone was muted compared with the bruising battle several months ago over an invasion of Iraq.
In that debate, France, Russia and Germany blocked the attempt by the United States, Britain and Spain to win U.N. approval for a war - and ties between the two sides were left severely strained.
On Friday, Russia's U.N. Ambassador Sergey Lavrov said Moscow has "a long list" of questions about the U.S. draft. French President Jacques Chirac insisted that "the United Nations should play a central role."
But Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said they were committed to "constructive negotiations" over the U.S. draft. "We are ready for pragmatic solutions," Schroeder said at a summit with Chirac and the Polish president.
U.S. diplomats stressed the proposal is not a "take it or leave it" plan.
Even co-sponsor Spain's ambassador, Inocencio Arias, said his country believes "this text can be improved ... But altogether it's a good way to try to find a solution to a situation which is rather complicated."
Others who did not support the U.S. attacks on Iraq reacted favorably. Angola's Ambassador Ismael Gaspar Martins called it "a good start" and Chile's Ambassador Gabriel Valdes said, "Our initial reaction is very positive."
Under the draft, the United Nations would give the United States and Britain authority to run the country as they put together a new Iraqi government. In a letter to the council on Thursday, Washington and London recognized for the first time their status as "occupying forces" in Iraq, which under the Geneva Conventions requires them to look out for the welfare of the Iraqi people.
The initial 12-month authorization would automatically be extended unless the council - where the United States and Britain hold a veto - decides to block it.
The draft resolution would lift economic sanctions on Iraq and phase out the oil-for-food humanitarian program. It would also end U.N. control of Iraq's oil revenues, putting them instead into an "Iraqi Assistance Fund" controlled by the United States and Britain under international observance.
Britain's ambassador Sir Jeremy Greenstock rejected suggestions the coalition troops were paving the way for a long stay in Baghdad and using revenues from the world's second largest oil reserves.
"For a temporary period while we control the security and what happens on the ground, we want those oilfields to be regenerated as a benefit, as an instrument, for the Iraqi people and we are very keen that should be done very efficiently," Greenstock told reporters.
"We want to leave Iraq as soon as it is possible to ensure stability and normal arrangements for a new country," he said.
The plan envisions only an advisory role for the United Nations, mostly on humanitarian front. U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan would appoint a special coordinator to work with U.S. and British authorities and the Iraqi people.
That coordinator also would promote delivery of humanitarian aid, the return of refugees, reconstruction, human rights, legal and judicial reform, and rebuilding of an Iraqi police force.
Secretary of State Colin Powell said in Washington he hoped the council would act quickly. "This resolution is straight to the point; it's a resolution that will serve the Iraqi people; it's a resolution that will ultimately result in the lifting of sanctions so that the world can again trade with Iraq," he said.
But France and Russia have already put forward sharply different ideas on how to manage postwar Iraq.
Russia wants U.N. weapons inspectors to return to Baghdad to certify that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction have been eliminated before sanctions are lifted, as called for under council resolutions. It also wants the oil-for-food program - and thus control of Iraqi oil money - continued under Annan's authority until Iraq has a legitimate government and sanctions are lifted.
The French proposal calls on the council to suspend sanctions, phase out the oil-for-food program, have U.S. and U.N. weapons inspectors work together, and lift sanctions when a legitimate Iraqi government is in place.
By RANJAN ROY Associated Press Writer
I bet they wish they had warmed to the pre-war plan.
Regardless of how they vote, at some point the Iraqis need to know how much of their oil money is still in French banks. Rumors have it that billions of dollars are still stashed away, but it's been impossible so far to get an accounting from the U.N., which was taking an official 2% off the top for every barrel. And what about the billions spent? Where did that go, besides palaces, bribes, and embargoed weapons shipments? A full accounting needs to be done, so the new Iraqi government (whenever it emerges) can have a firm grasp on what moneys they have in foreign banks to rebuild their country with.
Bush Doctrine Unfolds :
| To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below: | ||||
| click here >>> | Bush Doctrine Unfold | <<< click here | ||
| (To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) | ||||
It ought to be!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.