Skip to comments.
Man opens fire with machine gun at university; two injured
The Associated Press ^
| 5/9/03 5:10 PM
| By M.R. KROPKO
Posted on 05/09/2003 2:59:11 PM PDT by demlosers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-132 next last
To: Mr. Mojo
They're paid by the TV networks, who all get the exclusive TV movie rights to their individual wackos. It's part of the Hollywood - Government conspiracy to control the people and the ratings.
If guns are outlawed, only Hollywood will have guns!
101
posted on
05/09/2003 11:04:06 PM PDT
by
CWOJackson
(One nice thing about libertarians...they all tend to be paranoids.)
To: Travis McGee
this event is just in time for million mom march mothersday Sunday
102
posted on
05/10/2003 12:43:01 AM PDT
by
drZ
To: Gunslingr3
Precisely! I used to think it was a Democrat in the White House that caused these inciedents, now I realize that there seems to be an increase when anti-gun legislation is due to come up for a vote. Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
To: SW6906
< tin foil hat > Another sleeper activated to go bezerk with a gun, just in time to be used as fodder for the reauthorization of the Assault Weapon (sic) ban..... < \tin foil hat >
Yeah, all the high school age sleepers from the Columbine era should be in college now...
Comment #105 Removed by Moderator
To: FreedomCalls
I predict someone will die, impaled by an icicle, in the next few years. No problem the Campus police will just make ice against the law. That will solve the problem for sure. Of course anybody with snow on their shoes will have to be jailed, but hey, that is the price of freedom, right?
To: MediaMole
Loved it when the Fox folks explained that it was not tornado damage but the way the building was designed.
To: mabelkitty
my thoughts, exactly.
108
posted on
05/10/2003 11:42:42 AM PDT
by
demosthenes the elder
(If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
To: SW6906
oh, so I am NOT the only person who has this nagging and seemingly quite irrational suspicion that flamboyant gun-related crimes are awfully conveniently timed for the Leftist Agenda.
109
posted on
05/10/2003 11:45:40 AM PDT
by
demosthenes the elder
(If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
To: finnman69
WTFIT?!?
It makes my head hurt just looking at it.
I think I would go stark bonkers if I had to spend more than 5 seconds inside it.
110
posted on
05/10/2003 11:47:17 AM PDT
by
demosthenes the elder
(If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
To: All
111
posted on
05/10/2003 11:49:14 AM PDT
by
backhoe
To: marktwain
well put.
112
posted on
05/10/2003 11:52:10 AM PDT
by
demosthenes the elder
(If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
To: JMack
that seems an interesting avenue of research.
hrmn... I think we need to get all of the folks who have commented on the "tinfoilhat" timing comment to get together and think about this issue.
There IS something here.
113
posted on
05/10/2003 12:04:06 PM PDT
by
demosthenes the elder
(If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
To: All
114
posted on
05/10/2003 2:38:32 PM PDT
by
backhoe
To: cabbieguy
When the story first broke on FOX, it took them a second to say that there was a shooting. The first thing I saw was the building on the screen, and I thought to myself, "wow, that's some serious tornado damage."
To: Mr. Mojo
Take California. When they decided to ban so-called assault rifles they drew up the law then went looking for a crime to justify it. They released Pat Purdy from the mental institution for the 7th time, let him buy a gun, then he went to the Stockton school yard and shot a bunch of kids. The bill to ban assault rifles was immediatly filed, passed and signed into law before anyone could muster opposition to it.
Brittan. They wanted to ban handguns so they drafted the law then waited for the Dunblane massacre.
When they wanted to ban assault rifles they drafted the law and then Hungerford happened.
I guess I just have lived too long to trust any politician who wants to ban anything "for the children" or to "protect the public". There has always been an alternate motive behind it.
116
posted on
05/10/2003 6:04:08 PM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(If someone burns a cross on your lawn, the best firehose is an AK-47.)
To: finnman69
Those buildings . . . It's not hard to see why the poor SOB went 'postal' .
To: wardaddy
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
guess I just have lived too long to trust any politician who wants to ban anything "for the children" or to "protect the public". We're on the same page, my FRiend. I'm just unsure as to whether these crimminal incidents you speak of were gov't conspiracies. I'm not saying they're not; I just don't know.
To: finnman69
why do we not like Gehry. The very first time I saw it I thought it was the most miraculous thing I had ever seen. Your distaste for the building confounds me. My father said the same thing as you. What about it does not amaze you.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson