Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/09/2003 9:54:19 AM PDT by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: *Homosexual Agenda; .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; ...
After Richard Land noted that the GOP’s flirting with homosexual activism “divides its friends and unites its enemies,” Racicot said, “I’m not as suspicious as you. I don’t have the agenda you think I have.”

John Willke told him that the GOP needs Democratic votes to win elections, and that many Democats have two “hot-button family issues — abortion and homosexuality.”

Paul Weyrich said that “we want a clear, strong, unequivocal statement” from the GOP that homosexuality is immoral. Wildmon of AFA also said a statement was needed, and that he was tired of watching the GOP drift in the same direction as the Democrats on the issue of homosexual activism. He noted that if the GOP continued on this path, “we would walk.” He explained that many pro-family voters would not necessarily vote Democratic instead, but just stay home. Gary Palmer noted that millions of evangelical Christians did not vote in the 2000 election, that a vast majority of evangelicals who did vote pulled the GOP lever, and that the razor-thin GOP presidential victory might not be repeated in 2004 if the GOP alienates even more Christians.

Ping

2 posted on 05/09/2003 9:58:58 AM PDT by Polycarp ("When a mother can kill her own child, what is left of the West to save?" - Mother Theresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Racicot (believe it's pronounced Roscoe) is a weasel.
3 posted on 05/09/2003 10:00:36 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Sorry

After living in Rascals Montana, I cannot believe a thing he says. Yes he was one of the most popular Governors this state has ever seen, but he's nothing but a Dim in Republican clothing IMHO.

Semper Fi
4 posted on 05/09/2003 10:00:45 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (I AM the NRA and I VOTE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Keep the heat on. The politicians need a "backbone" check every now and then.
5 posted on 05/09/2003 10:00:46 AM PDT by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
I agree with Racicot. His job is to meet with everyone. He should do it.

I think the family associations, such as Wildmon's, do good things, that they are the base, and that they have a better vision for American families.

At the same time, we must be open to participation by all manner of people. Is it possible to enforce a Christian morality in one area and not enforce it in others? Shouldn't Republicans have a plank about adulterers or About alcoholics if it has one about homosexuality? I don't say this facetiously.

If someone wants to start a Christian Conservative Party that has certain religious requirements for membership, then they have every right to do that and to run candidates from that party.

If, however, there is a greater liklihood of getting some of what you want with a secular POLITICAL party, then there's some leeway that needs to be given.

It's an extremely tough area to define.

7 posted on 05/09/2003 10:06:08 AM PDT by RockBassCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Weak, but at least it's a start.

Racicot said, “I’m not as suspicious as you. I don’t have the agenda you think I have.” Not consciously, MAYBE, but he's aiding that agenda just the same.

I wonder if he is going ot prisons and meeting with those groups. Is he meeting with street gangs? Is he meeting with "swingers"? Maybe he would like to me with the KKK or NOW. I don't know, I bet we could name groups Racicot would refuse to meet with all day long.

8 posted on 05/09/2003 10:10:54 AM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
I'm with Marc.
Bauer is a bad joke.
9 posted on 05/09/2003 10:11:45 AM PDT by RJCogburn (Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
BUMP for later!
13 posted on 05/09/2003 10:27:33 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
This catering to the HomoPhilia agenda is stupid......why shoot yourself in the foot when you have such an advantage already.

Ronald Reagan was elected 2 terms as President because he never abandoned his core.......the GOP slips every time they try to "open up" to gay groups, illegal alien groups, and other groups that will never (in large numbers) ever vote GOP

If Christians stay home on Election Day in 2004......it may not cost the Presidency....it will cost the GOP the House and Senate
17 posted on 05/09/2003 10:46:33 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (We Buy No French Wine Because Of French Whine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Pity poor Marc Racicot. He's being called on the carpet by the hyper-paranoid, self-appointed guardians of the troglodyte wing of the Republican Party.
20 posted on 05/09/2003 11:22:31 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
I told Mr. Racicot that pro-family Americans viewed the homosexual activist agenda as a grave threat for two reasons: First, homosexuality hurts those who practice it.... health risks ... sexually transmitted diseases specific to homosexual conduct ...
The phrase "sexually transmitted diseases specific to homosexual conduct" really caught my attention, but without supporting evidence, it seems to be a reach. It's common sense that a greater incidence of STD's accompanies a greater incidence of promiscuity, but I have never heard of an STD that specifically targets same-sex promiscuity.
25 posted on 05/09/2003 12:25:18 PM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Racicot is an S.O.B. First he refused to run against Max Baucus, against whom he would have won a large victory and a desperately needed extra Senate seat for the GOP. Then he had to go coddle to the homos. I hope Bush is putting him as a "special adviser" to the 2004 campaign as a demotion. This guy is a real pussy.
28 posted on 05/09/2003 1:17:36 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Is Racicot as stupid as he wants us to believe??

If so, what in tarnation is he doing at RNC Chair???
29 posted on 05/09/2003 2:06:47 PM PDT by ninenot (H&K: Problem-Solver)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
I am uncomfortable.

Why is this article ignoring the fact that Racicot is also meeting with ex-homosexuals?

What is the agenda here? This concerns me that they are not being honest.
31 posted on 05/09/2003 2:08:36 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Homosexuals are giving more money to the RNC.

Until these family groups start writing checks and contribute to the party other than making demands because they want to, they won't have a leg to stand on.

It goes both ways. Racicot, as much as I don't like him, has a job to do.

32 posted on 05/09/2003 2:14:40 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
I'm a long-time member of the GOP base and I'm not feeling alienated. Makes me wonder who you consider to be "the GOP base".
52 posted on 05/09/2003 3:31:47 PM PDT by jokemoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Who thinks the GOP is waiting for just the right moment to put a knife in the back of its conservative Christian wing?
56 posted on 05/09/2003 4:17:00 PM PDT by ChuckMartelRox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Bump for later read and browse.
71 posted on 05/09/2003 7:01:14 PM PDT by k2blader (Reason is our soul's left hand, Faith her right. - John Donne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
“I would agree that is a matter of pause to me. I confess to some naivete.”

I'm not buying the line that Marc Racicot is naive. He is a seasoned hard-nosed politician -- the man G.W. Bush turned to secure the ballots in FL in November 2000. Racicot is conservative but he is NOT A CONSERVATIVE. And I don't think he believes in the family-values agenda other than to secure the votes for Bush in 2004 of those who accept this agenda. Racicot, if I am not mistaken, is a former Democrat. Perhaps there are elements of the "democratic process" that he can't shake loose even while serving as RNC chairman and soon as the new Bush campaign manager.
76 posted on 05/09/2003 7:51:37 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Well ... I'm the BASE - and I'm not going anywhere.
79 posted on 05/10/2003 1:43:49 AM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson