The slimer gives us another example of his total hypocrisy. It is the evolutionists which EVERY TIME an opponent starts showing that evolution is total bunk that start with the insults. For example, soon after I started posting on this thread (and getting no replies of course as is usual from the evolutionists since they cannot deny the truth but just insult the bearer of it).
I have often challenged you to show a single post from you on this thread which is not an insult. A single post from you discussing the subject at hand. There are none such because you do not discuss, you insult and encourage your friends to do the same and turn threads into shouting matches so that they will be pulled.
Oh, come now, you earned your insults with your continuous rudeness stretched over posts going back almost 2 years. Unlike you, most of the rest of us do not start each new thread with our memories wiped clean of what went before, so that our deponents have to repeat their arguments over and over until they drop out from ennui.
The slimer [note the insult] gives us another example of his total hypocrisy [note the insult]. It is the evolutionists which [sic] EVERY TIME an opponent starts showing that evolution is total bunk that start with the insults. For example, soon after I started posting on this thread (and getting no replies of course as is usual from the evolutionists since they cannot deny the truth but just insult the bearer of it).Let's take these one at a time:I have often challenged you to show a single post from you on this thread which is not an insult. A single post from you discussing the subject at hand. There are none such because you do not discuss, you insult and encourage your friends to do the same and turn threads into shouting matches so that they will be pulled.
1,799 posted on 05/21/2003 11:28 PM EDT by gore3000
It is the evolutionists which EVERY TIME an opponent starts showing that evolution is total bunk that start with the insults.I would respectfully suggest that factual rebuttals to some creationist argument, and pointing out that there have been innumerable rebuttals to the same argument in the past, do not constitute "insults."
For example, soon after I started posting on this thread (and getting no replies of course as is usual from the evolutionists since they cannot deny the truth but just insult the bearer of it).I would respectfully suggest that not responding to arguments deemed unworthy of response does not constitute an "insult."
I have often challenged you [PH] to show a single post from you on this thread which is not an insult. A single post from you discussing the subject at hand.I would respectfully direct the reader's attention to the following posts in this thread: 1045, 1120, 1123, and 1127. They deal with the substance of evolution. There just hasn't been all that much going on that required any more effort. Anyway, the "challenge" was to produce one such non-insulting post. Easily done.
Question: why am I being stalked and insulted like this?