[gore3000]

Since, unlike you, I don't take seriously the notion that prokariotes organized spontaneously out of pile of junk, this isn't my problem, now is it?

Lying about my statements. It is your friend donh that supports abiogenesis, not me. Clearly you have not been reading my statements. I am completely against the belief that life can come from non-life. I am glad at least that you agree with me on this one point.

[donh]

Lying about my statements. It is your friend donh that supports abiogenesis

Huh? Whose my friend "donh"? Is there another one? At any rate, you remain the same old transparent nudge you have always been. Of course, the issue is that the you support abiogensis in the sense that you insist that that's the only way prokariotes could have come into being, other than by divine intervention, and then insist that others must prove otherwise, holding them to the phony requirement that they support YOUR theory of life's origins. Silly Rabbit, don't you know tricks are for kids?

[donh]

I am completely against the belief that life can come from non-life.

Really? So...when the prokariotes leaped into existence instantaneously at God's behest--that was something different from creating life from non-life? Namely what?

Here, lets test you:
God created life from:
a) draino
b) nothing
c) a vortex in the ether
d) rainbows on roses and whiskers on kittens