Evolution is not just about prokaryotes and you know it.
A fairly idiotic attempt to distract from how tissue-thin your fundamental argument is through irrelevant agreement.
My statements apply to all evolution and you know that also.
Repetitive blue drivel at it's finest. I know no such thing. Nobody writ in concrete that fitness test failures are necessary for evolution to take place. They only become important when vast treasures of nutrients are in permanent short supply, relative to our ability to procreate.
1. the experiment is false because it does not punish as yet useless novelties.
Hogwash. prove it. You don't know squat about what the rules were before meat machines existed, and you've provided no compelling evidence whatsoever, for about an eon now, to suggest why I should take seriously the notion that there was nothing before meat machines. What's a virus?
2. that evolution is impossible because the gradualness of it cannot be achieved due to the necessity of each miniscule change making the organism more fit at each and every point.
As you know, but conceal from the audience, this is Behe-ist drivel that was disproved before Behe even published. How do you account for the immune system trying literally millions of failed combinations to drive out a foreign body before stumbling on the right one?
Now stop trying to confuse the issue and address the points I have made above about evolution and in post# 1329 about abiogenesis.
If I needed someone to guide and direct my conversations, I'd look up my ex-wife--you're not qualified on a breathtaking basis.
They are completely different questions which you continue to try to confuse with each other for some 100 posts already.
Even if you break your arm trying to pat yourself on the back, the points you have made are all predicated on the absurd notion that there was nothing before prokariotes. My argument is pretty simple, but it's easy to understand how you could get confused.
Really? Evolution does not say that natural selection is the agency by which the good and the bad changes in organisms are sifted???????????
The above is the reason why the evolutionists will never state exactly what the theory of evolution is and how it works. As soon as a refutation is given for what it obviously says and for what evolutionists have been saying for 150 years, they say that evolution is not about that. They are thus always saying what evolution is not, but never what evolution is since just about every single statement in it has been totally disproven.