Where did I claim that, exactly?
Let's see, in Post# 1255 you said:
Wolfram has demonstrated that about one in 256 ramdomly chosen, rudimentary discrete fields of discourse that can generate repeating patterns through simple cell relationships, generate turing machines.
Seems I have to keep reminding you of what each one of us posted just a post or two back. Losing your memory or trying to dance your way out of bluffs you have been called on?
.Seems I have to keep reminding you of what each one of us posted just a post or two back. Losing your memory or trying to dance your way out of bluffs you have been called on?
This surpasses even your capacity for rudeness.
This does not constitute a claim that I have read the book. No one has read the book--that would be like reading Numbers or the phone book. Like everyone else, except possibly Wolfram, I have scanned it for the meat, and ignored most of the examples and details of implementation.