Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Artificial Life Experiments Show How Complex Functions Can Evolve
NSF ^ | May 8, 2003 | Staff

Posted on 05/08/2003 10:11:06 AM PDT by Nebullis

Artificial Life Experiments Show How Complex Functions Can Evolve

Arlington, Va.—If the evolution of complex organisms were a road trip, then the simple country drives are what get you there. And sometimes even potholes along the way are important.

An interdisciplinary team of scientists at Michigan State University and the California Institute of Technology, with the help of powerful computers, has used a kind of artificial life, or ALife, to create a road map detailing the evolution of complex organisms, an old problem in biology.

In an article in the May 8 issue of the international journal Nature, Richard Lenski, Charles Ofria, Robert Pennock, and Christoph Adami report that the path to complex organisms is paved with a long series of simple functions, each unremarkable if viewed in isolation. "This project addresses a fundamental criticism of the theory of evolution, how complex functions arise from mutation and natural selection," said Sam Scheiner, program director in the division of environmental biology at the National Science Foundation (NSF), which funded the research through its Biocomplexity in the Environment initiative. "These simulations will help direct research on living systems and will provide understanding of the origins of biocomplexity."

Some mutations that cause damage in the short term ultimately become a positive force in the genetic pedigree of a complex organism. "The little things, they definitely count," said Lenski of Michigan State, the paper's lead author. "Our work allowed us to see how the most complex functions are built up from simpler and simpler functions. We also saw that some mutations looked like bad events when they happened, but turned out to be really important for the evolution of the population over a long period of time."

In the key phrase, "a long period of time," lies the magic of ALife. Lenski teamed up with Adami, a scientist at Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Ofria, a Michigan State computer scientist, to further explore ALife.

Pennock, a Michigan State philosopher, joined the team to study an artificial world inside a computer, a world in which computer programs take the place of living organisms. These computer programs go forth and multiply, they mutate and they adapt by natural selection.

The program, called Avida, is an artificial petri dish in which organisms not only reproduce, but also perform mathematical calculations to obtain rewards. Their reward is more computer time that they can use for making copies of themselves. Avida randomly adds mutations to the copies, thus spurring natural selection and evolution. The research team watched how these "bugs" adapted and evolved in different environments inside their artificial world.

Avida is the biologist's race car - a really souped up one. To watch the evolution of most living organisms would require thousands of years – without blinking. The digital bugs evolve at lightening speed, and they leave tracks for scientists to study.

"The cool thing is that we can trace the line of descent," Lenski said. "Out of a big population of organisms you can work back to see the pivotal mutations that really mattered during the evolutionary history of the population. The human mind can't sort through so much data, but we developed a tool to find these pivotal events."

There are no missing links with this technology.

Evolutionary theory sometimes struggles to explain the most complex features of organisms. Lenski uses the human eye as an example. It's obviously used for seeing, and it has all sorts of parts - like a lens that can be focused at different distances - that make it well suited for that use. But how did something so complicated as the eye come to be?

Since Charles Darwin, biologists have concluded that such features must have arisen through lots of intermediates and, moreover, that these intermediate structures may once have served different functions from what we see today. The crystalline proteins that make up the lens of the eye, for example, are related to those that serve enzymatic functions unrelated to vision. So, the theory goes, evolution borrowed an existing protein and used it for a new function.

"Over time," Lenski said, "an old structure could be tweaked here and there to improve it for its new function, and that's a lot easier than inventing something entirely new."

That's where ALife sheds light.

"Darwinian evolution is a process that doesn't specify exactly how the evolving information is coded," says Adami, who leads the Digital Life Laboratory at Caltech. "It affects DNA and computer code in much the same way, which allows us to study evolution in this electronic medium."

Many computer scientists and engineers are now using processes based on principles of genetics and evolution to solve complex problems, design working robots, and more. Ofria says that "we can then apply these concepts when trying to decide how best to solve computational problems."

"Evolutionary design," says Pennock, "can often solve problems better than we can using our own intelligence."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ai; crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,961-1,975 next last
To: RonF
>>It seems to me, however, that in many of the evolution/creationism threads, acceptance of evolution seems to be associated with liberal politics, and creationism with conservative politics, which doesn't make sense to me.<<

I associate creationism with some fundamentalist Protestant Christian sects -- I am not aware of any other creationists but I may be wrong here.

My husband is a fundamentalist Lutheran but Lutherans believe in evolution, or at least he does.

I'm Catholic, and Catholics believe in evolution.
101 posted on 05/08/2003 11:35:25 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: donh
That's how you atheists... er, "bible mistrusters" (is that a better term?)... try and rationalize those who actually believe in the word of God, as it is explicitly spelled out in the Bible?

Funny how you'd take the words of the Pope over the word of God. I guess humans know more than their creator, eh?
102 posted on 05/08/2003 11:35:59 AM PDT by AmericanAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RonF
It seems to me, however, that in many of the evolution/creationism threads, acceptance of evolution seems to be associated with liberal politics, and creationism with conservative politics, which doesn't make sense to me.

That's because it doesn't make sense. It's one of the tragic facts of the 20th century that the left has somehow managed to spread the lie that theirs is the "intellectual" position. They absolutely love to find a well-known flat-earther in the Republican party, and they hold him up as a "typical example" of conservative thought. But it's a shabby tactic. Most of the idiots, in my experience, are on the left. I don't know what it's all about with this creationism stuff, but I'm determined that it shall not become the public face of the Republican party.

103 posted on 05/08/2003 11:36:00 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: donh
It is insulting to both skitzophrenics and people with Attention Defecit Disorder.

As a person suffering from one of the above, I await f.Christian's apology :)
104 posted on 05/08/2003 11:36:45 AM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: js1138
The Bible says that Jesus could see all the kingdoms of the world from a mountaintop. This could only be done if the earth is flat.

Not so, my friend. Ever heard of x-ray vision?

105 posted on 05/08/2003 11:36:55 AM PDT by Gee Wally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Being able to see all of the kingdoms of the world is a phrase. Please, explain to me how all of Gen. 1 is a "phrase".
106 posted on 05/08/2003 11:37:29 AM PDT by AmericanAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
FR anarcho-loons !
107 posted on 05/08/2003 11:37:39 AM PDT by f.Christian (( Marching orders: comfort the afflicted // afflict the comfortable ! ! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: AmericanAge
If you are a literalist, I guess that would be true, but tell me the lesson that was taught by Genisis.

I think that you could probably figure it out if you think hard enough.

The BIBLE is NOT a history book, although it has some excellent historical references, it is a book of morals, and it teaches those through stories that are easily understood.

I am sure, if you used the common sense that you claim you have, you can figure it out.

I did, it was quite simple actually.

Science and the bible do not collide at all, if you don't take the bible literally, but if you take it literally, you will collide with science head to head, as you are doing now.
108 posted on 05/08/2003 11:37:59 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
only fools believe in the ideology of evolution !

I was not aware that evolution was an "ideology", but only a theory in science. I believe you have confused two, distinctly separate, subjects.

109 posted on 05/08/2003 11:38:22 AM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
I am still waiting for the Zapruder film proving that we all came from pool of primordial slime.
110 posted on 05/08/2003 11:38:33 AM PDT by RomanCatholicProlifer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: js1138
This could only be done if the earth is flat.

Or if it was inside out, a mini-Dyson sphere of some kind.

111 posted on 05/08/2003 11:38:50 AM PDT by balrog666 (When in doubt, tell the truth. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Nebullis
re: "must have arisen ")))

Where would an explanation of evolution be, without the passive voice...?

112 posted on 05/08/2003 11:39:57 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
What I would like to see is the creationists give a list of reasons ofwhy Evolution is not true, then, the evolutionist gets as much time as necessary to refute each point.

Forget that. I want to see a setup where the creationist provides evidence for their alternative explanation for life origins. Something that's observable, testable and falsifiable.
113 posted on 05/08/2003 11:40:29 AM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Actually, only Creationists seem to believe that.
114 posted on 05/08/2003 11:40:30 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
It's not a history book?

Please then - why is there the Book of Numbers?

The bible is *both* about history, *and* morals.
115 posted on 05/08/2003 11:41:44 AM PDT by AmericanAge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: donh
I really dislike your fragmented impersonation

I think that's why he/she/it has adopted this affectation in its post's. To be annoying.

116 posted on 05/08/2003 11:41:46 AM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
You know, I had never heard of a Dyson sphere until that Star Trek NG episode with Scotty.

I love Star Trek.

I gotta get that poster, everything I learned, I learned from Star Trek. LOL
117 posted on 05/08/2003 11:41:58 AM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
only fools believe in the evolution ideology THEORY of science -- life !

118 posted on 05/08/2003 11:42:02 AM PDT by f.Christian (( Marching orders: comfort the afflicted // afflict the comfortable ! ! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
If a tree falls in the forest and there is no one around, does it kill two birds with one stone?
119 posted on 05/08/2003 11:42:25 AM PDT by Grando Calrissian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Well, there are some people who believe that conservativism requires being a Biblical literalist. No non-Christians need apply, and all that.
120 posted on 05/08/2003 11:42:30 AM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,961-1,975 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson