Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: khenrich; Stultis
If republican representatives or senators were to continually hold press conferences, or call in media types to give statements about the tactic the Democrats are using, the next election might solve the problem by eliminating some of the blockers.

I like the ideas that both of you have displayed. The term 'nuclear option' is really one that is meant to ellicit harsh reactions and I don't think that it should be allowed to define the debate. It is also wrong, as in the 'quagmire', 'Vietnam repeat', 'massive civilian casulties' vein.

My next question is: What if Bush made recess appts., do they have to exit as soon as Congress reconvenes? Or does a replacement have to be voted on? Will they filibuster that or be glad of the replacement? Does the recess appt. stay until a new judge has been voted on? Depending on the answers, it could be a new source of hardball. It would go well with your suggestions.

117 posted on 05/07/2003 5:11:44 PM PDT by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: patj
Recess appointments expire at the end of the next session, unless they are confirmed in the meantime. For example, if Bush makes an appointment at the end of this year, it will expire at the end of next year.

Recess appointments of life-tenured judges are uncommon. Clinton did it on his way out the door, and so did Carter.

119 posted on 05/07/2003 5:36:33 PM PDT by Stay the course
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson