Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/04/2003 6:13:18 AM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RJCogburn
the only people who saw this is the 9 guys there
2 posted on 05/04/2003 6:14:04 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
Headline should read: Candidates for Democratic nomination squabble over who will re-distribute more of your hard earned money to drug-pushers and prostitutes.
4 posted on 05/04/2003 6:32:10 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
"A proposal by Representative Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri to abolish President Bush's tax cuts and use the money to provide subsidies to business to cover health care insurance..."

And the difference between this proposal and a tax cut for wealthy corporations is what? Who presented it?

5 posted on 05/04/2003 6:34:03 AM PDT by Bernard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
=== Cut === Paste === Email to Friends and Family ===

In the upcoming democratic primary (2004) ...

BIG AL NEEDS OUR HELP! - Register as a democrat and vote for Crazy Al!

Rev. Al Sharpton is officially running for president in 2004.

During the May 3, 2003 demoncrap debate in Columbia, S.C., our man Al stated “The way to move a donkey is to slap the donkey,” and “I’m going to slap the donkey until the donkey kicks”.

Let’s help Crazy Al slap the donkey until it kicks.

Assume GW has the Republican nomination sewn up. Its time for all good republicans, libertarians, and independents to stand up and be counted. Lets take a page from Sen. McCain’s play book. Prior to the 2004 democratic presidential primary in your state, re-register as a democrat and vote for Al Sharpton!

Wouldn’t it be great if Crazy Al won! At the very least, lets ensure he gets prime time speaking rights at the 2004 nationally televised democratic convention. You gotta love it. Line up, sign up, and send this to all your like-minded friends.

In case you’d like to send Big Al a donation:
http://www.sharptonexplore2004.com/

Anyone need a bumper sticker or button?
http://democraticbuttons.freeservers.com/

Anyone know where I can get a yard sign?

=== Cut === Paste === Email to Friends and Family ===
6 posted on 05/04/2003 7:20:29 AM PDT by schaketo (Vote for Crazy Al Sharpton in the Demoncrap Primaries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Election President
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
7 posted on 05/04/2003 8:20:52 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
I believe a "fissure" is an uncomfortable affliction of the nether, or clymer regions of the body. So the headline is great: Debate shows party fissures, namely the candidates.
8 posted on 05/04/2003 9:05:16 AM PDT by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
 

 

hyperlinked images of shame
copyright Mia T 2003.

by Mia T, 4.6.03

 

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

 

Mia T, THE ALIENS

 

Al From is sounding the alarm. "Unless we convince Americans that Democrats are strong on national security," he warns his party, "Democrats will continue to lose elections."

Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem.

From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason.

That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will… which means both in real time and historically.

When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.)

Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent.

With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively… and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity.

With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)… and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity.

The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11.

The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime



Q ERTY8missus clinton's REAL virtual office update bump!

9 posted on 05/05/2003 3:37:31 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
Howard Dean is a medical doctor, so it isn't incorrect to refer to him as Dr. Dean, but it sounds strange. George McGovern has a Ph.D. but he isn't normally referred to as Dr. McGovern. The New York Times seems to use the title only of people they like, like Howard Dean and Radovan Karadzic. (During the war in Bosnia they were constantly referring to Karadzic as Dr. Karadzic...they didn't do the same to Tudjman, who had a Ph.D.)
12 posted on 05/05/2003 6:52:52 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson